From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 14/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:45:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507769154.17492.30.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171011145729.j7rm3jduvczdhbek@pd.tnic>
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 16:57 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 08:54:17PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >
> > The segment descriptor contains information that is relevant to how linear
> > addresses need to be computed. It contains the default size of addresses
> > as well as the base address of the segment. Thus, given a segment
> > selector, we ought to look at segment descriptor to correctly calculate
> > the linear address.
> >
> > In protected mode, the segment selector might indicate a segment
> > descriptor from either the global descriptor table or a local descriptor
> > table. Both cases are considered in this function.
> ...
>
> >
> > +static struct desc_struct *get_desc(unsigned short sel)
> > +{
> > + struct desc_ptr gdt_desc = {0, 0};
> > + unsigned long desc_base;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODIFY_LDT_SYSCALL
> > + struct desc_struct *desc = NULL;
> > + struct ldt_struct *ldt;
> You moved those out of the if-statement even though they're needed only
> in that scope. Why?
No reason, this is not correct. I will move them into the if-statement.
> Here's a diff that moves them back there and improves the function comment.
>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> index 62975f825556..c4e82bb4c4d3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> @@ -456,11 +456,11 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct
> pt_regs *regs,
> }
>
> /**
> - * get_desc() - Obtain address of segment descriptor
> + * get_desc() - Obtain pointer to a segment descriptor
> * @sel: Segment selector
> *
> - * Given a segment selector, obtain a pointer to the segment descriptor.
> - * Both global and local descriptor tables are supported.
> + * Given a segment selector, obtain a pointer to the corresponding segment
> + * descriptor. Both global and local descriptor tables are supported.
> *
> * Returns:
> *
> @@ -474,10 +474,10 @@ static struct desc_struct *get_desc(unsigned short sel)
> unsigned long desc_base;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MODIFY_LDT_SYSCALL
> - struct desc_struct *desc = NULL;
> - struct ldt_struct *ldt;
> -
> if ((sel & SEGMENT_TI_MASK) == SEGMENT_LDT) {
> + struct desc_struct *desc = NULL;
> + struct ldt_struct *ldt;
> +
> /* Bits [15:3] contain the index of the desired entry. */
> sel >>= 3;
>
I will take your diff along with your Improvements-by: tag.
Thanks and BR,
Ricardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 3:54 [PATCH v9 00/29] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 01/29] x86/mm: Relocate page fault error codes to traps.h Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 02/29] x86/boot: Relocate definition of the initial state of CR0 Ricardo Neri
2017-10-26 7:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-10-26 9:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-26 9:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-10-26 12:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-27 19:02 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 03/29] ptrace,x86: Make user_64bit_mode() available to 32-bit builds Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 04/29] uprobes/x86: Use existing definitions for segment override prefixes Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 05/29] x86/mpx: Simplify handling of errors when computing linear addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 06/29] x86/mpx: Use signed variables to compute effective addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-10-05 9:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-05 17:38 ` Neri, Ricardo
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 07/29] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.index if its value is 100b and ModRM.mod is not 11b Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 08/29] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.base if its value is 101b and ModRM.mod = 0 Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 09/29] x86/mpx, x86/insn: Relocate insn util functions to a new insn-eval file Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 10/29] x86/insn-eval: Do not BUG on invalid register type Ricardo Neri
2017-10-07 16:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-09 23:56 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 11/29] x86/insn-eval: Add a utility function to get register offsets Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 12/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to identify string instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 13/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector Ricardo Neri
2017-10-10 22:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-12 1:12 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-12 9:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-13 1:08 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-13 11:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-13 18:43 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-17 9:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-17 20:31 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-18 20:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-19 6:30 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 7:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-20 18:05 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 14/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor Ricardo Neri
2017-10-11 14:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-12 0:45 ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 15/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment descriptor base address and limit Ricardo Neri
2017-10-11 15:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-11 19:57 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-11 20:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-12 1:24 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-12 16:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 16/29] x86/insn-eval: Add function to get default params of code segment Ricardo Neri
2017-10-12 16:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-12 18:27 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 17/29] x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement if ModRM.mod is 0 and ModRM.rm is 101b Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 15:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-20 18:07 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 18/29] x86/insn-eval: Incorporate segment base in linear address computation Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 16:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-20 18:10 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 19/29] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 32-bit address encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-20 18:24 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 18:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-20 19:16 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-20 22:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 20/29] x86/insn-eval: Add wrapper function for 32 and 64-bit addresses Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 21/29] x86/insn-eval: Handle 32-bit address encodings in virtual-8086 mode Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 22/29] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 16-bit addressing encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 23/29] x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 24/29] x86: Add emulation code for UMIP instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 25/29] x86/umip: Force a page fault when unable to copy emulated result to user Ricardo Neri
2017-10-26 7:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-10-27 21:46 ` Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 26/29] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 27/29] x86/traps: Fixup general protection faults caused by UMIP Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 28/29] selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-10-04 3:54 ` [PATCH v9 29/29] selftests/x86: Add tests for instruction str and sldt Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507769154.17492.30.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adam.buchbinder@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome