From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Regression: unable to boot after commit bd9240a18edf ("x86/apic: Add TSC_DEADLINE quirk due to errata") - Surface Pro 4 SKL
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 23:42:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513698161.2745.14.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171219152307.ugmlynst574wsdne@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 16:23 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 06:48:24PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 21:28 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, can you see if this makes you Surface boot?
> > >
> > No, it does not boot.
> So I'm confused on the lapic calibration.
>
> That stuff uses global_clock_event, which is initially the i8253
> (PIT),
> but because !PIC this thing won't be there either on your platform.
>
> Then we initialize I/O APIC, and your machine has:
>
> [ 0.000000] IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 32, address 0xfec00000,
> GSI 0-119
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl
> dfl)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high
> level)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
>
> So your ACPI table has an override for IRQ2 and routes it to IRQ0.
>
> Then we initialize HPET, and we _always_ do hpet_enable_legacy_int(),
> which sets the LegacyRouting bit.
Right.
> The HPET document says:
>
> If the ENABLE_CNF bit and the LEG_RT_CNF bit are both set, then the
> interrupts will be routed as follows:
>
> Timer 0 will be routed to IRQ0 in Non-APIC or IRQ2 in the I/O
> APIC
But AFAICS, the HPET emulated timer interrupts goes to IRQ0 on all the
machines I have tested, but on this MS Surface Pro 4, there is no irq 0
row in /proc/interrupts.
$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
8: 0 1 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 8-
edge rtc0
9: 476 144 4573 132 IR-IO-APIC 9-
fasteoi acpi
14: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 14-
edge INT344B:00
16: 646 4971 63574 3973 IR-IO-APIC 16-
fasteoi idma64.0, MRVL_PCIE, i2c_designware.0
17: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 17-
fasteoi idma64.1, i2c_designware.1
18: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 18-
fasteoi idma64.2, i2c_designware.2
19: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 19-
fasteoi idma64.3, i2c_designware.3
Maybe I need to check if IRQ0 is overridden on other platforms, if no,
registering to IRQ2 for HPET Timer 0 could help in this case?
> Timer 1 will be routed to IRQ8 in Non-APIC or IRQ8 in the I/O
> APIC
> Timer 2-n will be routed as per the routing in the timer n config
> registers.
>
> If the LegacyReplacement Route bit is set, the individual routing
> bits
> for timers 0 and 1 (APIC or FSB) will have no impact.
>
> And then we set global_clock_event to &hpet_clockevent.
Yes, I can confirm this.
>
> At this point that _SHOULD_ work afaict, even without actual PIC
> present.
so IOAPIC is ready when we calibrating Lapic timer?
>
> Sometime after that we call into calibrate_APIC_clock() -- because
> !TSC_DEADLINE -- and this is where you get stuck, because
> global_clock_event is not in fact delivering interrupts.
right.
>
> Thomas may have more clue, we'll have to wait for him to have a
> time-slot available.
okay.
thanks,
rui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-19 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 2:08 Zhang Rui
2017-11-28 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-28 8:22 ` Zhang Rui
2017-11-28 9:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 10:59 ` Zhang Rui
2017-11-28 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-29 14:44 ` Zhang Rui
2017-12-18 20:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 10:48 ` Zhang Rui
2017-12-19 13:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 15:23 ` Zhang Rui
2017-12-19 15:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 15:43 ` Zhang Rui
2017-12-19 15:42 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2017-12-19 16:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:08 ` Zhang Rui
2017-12-20 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-28 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513698161.2745.14.camel@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome