mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Regression: unable to boot after commit bd9240a18edf ("x86/apic: Add TSC_DEADLINE quirk due to errata") - Surface Pro 4 SKL
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 23:43:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513698227.2745.15.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171219153133.b4oxopq7myy2wjje@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 16:31 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:23:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 06:48:24PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 21:28 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hi, can you see if this makes you Surface boot?
> > > > 
> > > No, it does not boot.
> > So I'm confused on the lapic calibration.
> > 
> > That stuff uses global_clock_event, which is initially the i8253
> > (PIT),
> > but because !PIC this thing won't be there either on your platform.
> > 
> > Then we initialize I/O APIC, and your machine has:
> > 
> > [    0.000000] IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 32, address
> > 0xfec00000, GSI 0-119
> > [    0.000000] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl
> > dfl)
> > [    0.000000] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high
> > level)
> > [    0.000000] ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
> > [    0.000000] ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
> > 
> > So your ACPI table has an override for IRQ2 and routes it to IRQ0.
> > 
> > Then we initialize HPET, and we _always_ do
> > hpet_enable_legacy_int(),
> > which sets the LegacyRouting bit. The HPET document says:
> > 
> >   If the ENABLE_CNF bit and the LEG_RT_CNF bit are both set, then
> > the
> >   interrupts will be routed as follows:
> > 
> >     Timer 0 will be routed to IRQ0 in Non-APIC or IRQ2 in the I/O
> > APIC
> >     Timer 1 will be routed to IRQ8 in Non-APIC or IRQ8 in the I/O
> > APIC
> >     Timer 2-n will be routed as per the routing in the timer n
> > config registers.
> > 
> >   If the LegacyReplacement Route bit is set, the individual routing
> > bits
> >   for timers 0 and 1 (APIC or FSB) will have no impact.
> > 
> > And then we set global_clock_event to &hpet_clockevent.
> > 
> > At this point that _SHOULD_ work afaict, even without actual PIC
> > present.
> > 
> > Sometime after that we call into calibrate_APIC_clock() -- because
> > !TSC_DEADLINE -- and this is where you get stuck, because
> > global_clock_event is not in fact delivering interrupts.
> > 
> > Thomas may have more clue, we'll have to wait for him to have a
> > time-slot available.
> What does your /proc/interrupts look like (on a tsc-deadline boot) ?
> 
> 0: is the HPET, LOC: is the lapic/tsc-deadline
> 
> On my SKL desktop I get 21 PIT/HPET ticks on CPU0 before lapic takes
> over.
No irq0.
 LOC:     220071     210079     184892     176494   Local timer
interrupts

thanks,
rui

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-19 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-28  2:08 Zhang Rui
2017-11-28  8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-28  8:22   ` Zhang Rui
2017-11-28  9:34     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-28 10:59       ` Zhang Rui
2017-11-28 12:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-29 14:44           ` Zhang Rui
2017-12-18 20:28             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 10:48               ` Zhang Rui
2017-12-19 13:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 15:23                   ` Zhang Rui
2017-12-19 15:23                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 15:31                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 15:43                     ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2017-12-19 15:42                   ` Zhang Rui
2017-12-19 16:01                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 17:23                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:08                         ` Zhang Rui
2017-12-20 14:48                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-28  9:35     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1513698227.2745.15.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome