From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: add support for non-strict mode
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:18:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1531376312-2192-5-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531376312-2192-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To support the non-strict mode, now we only tlbi and sync for the strict
mode. But for the non-leaf case, always follow strict mode.
Use the lowest bit of the iova parameter to pass the strict mode:
0, IOMMU_STRICT;
1, IOMMU_NON_STRICT;
Treat 0 as IOMMU_STRICT, so that the unmap operation can compatible with
other IOMMUs which still use strict mode.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
index 010a254..9234db3 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static void __arm_lpae_set_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, arm_lpae_iopte pte,
static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
unsigned long iova, size_t size, int lvl,
- arm_lpae_iopte *ptep);
+ arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, int strict);
static void __arm_lpae_init_pte(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
phys_addr_t paddr, arm_lpae_iopte prot,
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int arm_lpae_init_pte(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
size_t sz = ARM_LPAE_BLOCK_SIZE(lvl, data);
tblp = ptep - ARM_LPAE_LVL_IDX(iova, lvl, data);
- if (WARN_ON(__arm_lpae_unmap(data, iova, sz, lvl, tblp) != sz))
+ if (WARN_ON(__arm_lpae_unmap(data, iova, sz, lvl, tblp, IOMMU_STRICT) != sz))
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static void arm_lpae_free_pgtable(struct io_pgtable *iop)
static size_t arm_lpae_split_blk_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
unsigned long iova, size_t size,
arm_lpae_iopte blk_pte, int lvl,
- arm_lpae_iopte *ptep)
+ arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, int strict)
{
struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg = &data->iop.cfg;
arm_lpae_iopte pte, *tablep;
@@ -576,15 +576,18 @@ static size_t arm_lpae_split_blk_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
}
if (unmap_idx < 0)
- return __arm_lpae_unmap(data, iova, size, lvl, tablep);
+ return __arm_lpae_unmap(data, iova, size, lvl, tablep, strict);
io_pgtable_tlb_add_flush(&data->iop, iova, size, size, true);
+ if (!strict)
+ io_pgtable_tlb_sync(&data->iop);
+
return size;
}
static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
unsigned long iova, size_t size, int lvl,
- arm_lpae_iopte *ptep)
+ arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, int strict)
{
arm_lpae_iopte pte;
struct io_pgtable *iop = &data->iop;
@@ -609,7 +612,7 @@ static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
io_pgtable_tlb_sync(iop);
ptep = iopte_deref(pte, data);
__arm_lpae_free_pgtable(data, lvl + 1, ptep);
- } else {
+ } else if (strict) {
io_pgtable_tlb_add_flush(iop, iova, size, size, true);
}
@@ -620,25 +623,27 @@ static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
* minus the part we want to unmap
*/
return arm_lpae_split_blk_unmap(data, iova, size, pte,
- lvl + 1, ptep);
+ lvl + 1, ptep, strict);
}
/* Keep on walkin' */
ptep = iopte_deref(pte, data);
- return __arm_lpae_unmap(data, iova, size, lvl + 1, ptep);
+ return __arm_lpae_unmap(data, iova, size, lvl + 1, ptep, strict);
}
static size_t arm_lpae_unmap(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops, unsigned long iova,
size_t size)
{
+ int strict = ((iova & IOMMU_STRICT_MODE_MASK) == IOMMU_STRICT);
struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data = io_pgtable_ops_to_data(ops);
arm_lpae_iopte *ptep = data->pgd;
int lvl = ARM_LPAE_START_LVL(data);
+ iova &= ~IOMMU_STRICT_MODE_MASK;
if (WARN_ON(iova >= (1ULL << data->iop.cfg.ias)))
return 0;
- return __arm_lpae_unmap(data, iova, size, lvl, ptep);
+ return __arm_lpae_unmap(data, iova, size, lvl, ptep, strict);
}
static phys_addr_t arm_lpae_iova_to_phys(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops,
--
1.8.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-12 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-12 6:18 [PATCH v3 0/6] add non-strict mode support for arm-smmu-v3 Zhen Lei
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: fix the implementation of flush_iotlb_all hook Zhen Lei
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] iommu/dma: add support for non-strict mode Zhen Lei
2018-07-24 22:01 ` Robin Murphy
2018-07-26 4:15 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] iommu/amd: use default branch to deal with all non-supported capabilities Zhen Lei
2018-07-12 6:18 ` Zhen Lei [this message]
2018-07-24 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: add support for non-strict mode Robin Murphy
2018-07-26 7:20 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-07-26 14:35 ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-06 1:32 ` Yang, Shunyong
2018-08-14 8:33 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-08-14 8:35 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-14 10:02 ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-15 1:43 ` Yang, Shunyong
2018-08-15 7:33 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-15 7:35 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-16 0:43 ` Yang, Shunyong
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: " Zhen Lei
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: add bootup option "iommu_strict_mode" Zhen Lei
2018-07-24 22:46 ` Robin Murphy
2018-07-26 7:41 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-07-24 21:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] add non-strict mode support for arm-smmu-v3 Robin Murphy
2018-07-26 3:44 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-07-26 14:16 ` Robin Murphy
2018-07-27 2:49 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-07-27 9:37 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1531376312-2192-5-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®