From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] iommu/dma: add support for non-strict mode
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 23:01:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a668c7c-bce6-eef0-e11d-319333c60fcb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531376312-2192-3-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
On 2018-07-12 7:18 AM, Zhen Lei wrote:
> 1. Save the related domain pointer in struct iommu_dma_cookie, make iovad
> capable call domain->ops->flush_iotlb_all to flush TLB.
> 2. Add a new iommu capability: IOMMU_CAP_NON_STRICT, which used to indicate
> that the iommu domain support non-strict mode.
> 3. During the iommu domain initialization phase, call capable() to check
> whether it support non-strcit mode. If so, call init_iova_flush_queue
> to register iovad->flush_cb callback.
> 4. All unmap(contains iova-free) APIs will finally invoke __iommu_dma_unmap
> -->iommu_dma_free_iova. If the domain is non-strict, call queue_iova to
> put off iova freeing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/iommu.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index ddcbbdb..9f0c77a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct iommu_dma_cookie {
> };
> struct list_head msi_page_list;
> spinlock_t msi_lock;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain_non_strict;
> };
>
> static inline size_t cookie_msi_granule(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie)
> @@ -257,6 +258,17 @@ static int iova_reserve_iommu_regions(struct device *dev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void iommu_dma_flush_iotlb_all(struct iova_domain *iovad)
> +{
> + struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> +
> + cookie = container_of(iovad, struct iommu_dma_cookie, iovad);
> + domain = cookie->domain_non_strict;
> +
> + domain->ops->flush_iotlb_all(domain);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * iommu_dma_init_domain - Initialise a DMA mapping domain
> * @domain: IOMMU domain previously prepared by iommu_get_dma_cookie()
> @@ -272,6 +284,7 @@ static int iova_reserve_iommu_regions(struct device *dev,
> int iommu_dma_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t base,
> u64 size, struct device *dev)
> {
> + const struct iommu_ops *ops = domain->ops;
> struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie = domain->iova_cookie;
> struct iova_domain *iovad = &cookie->iovad;
> unsigned long order, base_pfn, end_pfn;
> @@ -308,6 +321,15 @@ int iommu_dma_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t base,
> }
>
> init_iova_domain(iovad, 1UL << order, base_pfn);
> +
> + if ((ops->capable && ops->capable(IOMMU_CAP_NON_STRICT)) &&
> + (IOMMU_DOMAIN_STRICT_MODE(domain) == IOMMU_NON_STRICT)) {
> + BUG_ON(!ops->flush_iotlb_all);
> +
> + cookie->domain_non_strict = domain;
> + init_iova_flush_queue(iovad, iommu_dma_flush_iotlb_all, NULL);
> + }
> +
> if (!dev)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -390,6 +412,9 @@ static void iommu_dma_free_iova(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie,
> /* The MSI case is only ever cleaning up its most recent allocation */
> if (cookie->type == IOMMU_DMA_MSI_COOKIE)
> cookie->msi_iova -= size;
> + else if (cookie->domain_non_strict)
> + queue_iova(iovad, iova_pfn(iovad, iova),
> + size >> iova_shift(iovad), 0);
> else
> free_iova_fast(iovad, iova_pfn(iovad, iova),
> size >> iova_shift(iovad));
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 19938ee..82ed979 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,12 @@ struct iommu_domain_geometry {
> #define IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA (__IOMMU_DOMAIN_PAGING | \
> __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_API)
>
> +#define IOMMU_STRICT 0
> +#define IOMMU_NON_STRICT 1
> +#define IOMMU_STRICT_MODE_MASK 1UL
> +#define IOMMU_DOMAIN_STRICT_MODE(domain) \
> + (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> +
> struct iommu_domain {
> unsigned type;
> const struct iommu_ops *ops;
> @@ -101,6 +107,7 @@ enum iommu_cap {
> transactions */
> IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP, /* IOMMU supports interrupt isolation */
> IOMMU_CAP_NOEXEC, /* IOMMU_NOEXEC flag */
> + IOMMU_CAP_NON_STRICT, /* IOMMU supports non-strict mode */
This still isn't a capability of the hardware. Non-strict mode is pure
software policy; *every IOMMU ever* supports it.
If you want to have this kind of per-driver control, make it a domain
attribute - that's not only more logical, but should also work out a lot
cleaner overall.
Robin.
> };
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-12 6:18 [PATCH v3 0/6] add non-strict mode support for arm-smmu-v3 Zhen Lei
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: fix the implementation of flush_iotlb_all hook Zhen Lei
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] iommu/dma: add support for non-strict mode Zhen Lei
2018-07-24 22:01 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2018-07-26 4:15 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] iommu/amd: use default branch to deal with all non-supported capabilities Zhen Lei
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: add support for non-strict mode Zhen Lei
2018-07-24 22:25 ` Robin Murphy
2018-07-26 7:20 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-07-26 14:35 ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-06 1:32 ` Yang, Shunyong
2018-08-14 8:33 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-08-14 8:35 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-14 10:02 ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-15 1:43 ` Yang, Shunyong
2018-08-15 7:33 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-15 7:35 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-16 0:43 ` Yang, Shunyong
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: " Zhen Lei
2018-07-12 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: add bootup option "iommu_strict_mode" Zhen Lei
2018-07-24 22:46 ` Robin Murphy
2018-07-26 7:41 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-07-24 21:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] add non-strict mode support for arm-smmu-v3 Robin Murphy
2018-07-26 3:44 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-07-26 14:16 ` Robin Murphy
2018-07-27 2:49 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-07-27 9:37 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a668c7c-bce6-eef0-e11d-319333c60fcb@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome