From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thomas.lendacky@amd.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: use CPUID to locate host page table reserved bits
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 16:40:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1575474037-7903-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
The comment in kvm_get_shadow_phys_bits refers to MKTME, but the same is actually
true of SME and SEV. Just use CPUID[0x8000_0008].EAX[7:0] unconditionally if
available, it is simplest and works even if memory is not encrypted.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 6f92b40d798c..1e4ee4f8de5f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -538,16 +538,20 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask,
static u8 kvm_get_shadow_phys_bits(void)
{
/*
- * boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits is reduced when MKTME is detected
- * in CPU detection code, but MKTME treats those reduced bits as
- * 'keyID' thus they are not reserved bits. Therefore for MKTME
- * we should still return physical address bits reported by CPUID.
+ * boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits is reduced when MKTME or SME are detected
+ * in CPU detection code, but the processor treats those reduced bits as
+ * 'keyID' thus they are not reserved bits. Therefore KVM needs to look at
+ * the physical address bits reported by CPUID.
*/
- if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TME) ||
- WARN_ON_ONCE(boot_cpu_data.extended_cpuid_level < 0x80000008))
- return boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits;
+ if (likely(boot_cpu_data.extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000008))
+ return cpuid_eax(0x80000008) & 0xff;
- return cpuid_eax(0x80000008) & 0xff;
+ /*
+ * Quite weird to have VMX or SVM but not MAXPHYADDR; probably a VM with
+ * custom CPUID. Proceed with whatever the kernel found since these features
+ * aren't virtualizable (SME/SEV also require CPUIDs higher than 0x80000008).
+ */
+ return boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits;
}
static void kvm_mmu_reset_all_pte_masks(void)
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-12-04 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-04 15:40 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-12-04 15:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-12-10 9:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-10 15:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-12-04 15:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2019-12-10 3:53 ` Huang, Kai
2019-12-10 9:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-10 9:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-11 0:11 ` Huang, Kai
2019-12-11 9:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-11 20:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2019-12-11 23:16 ` Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1575474037-7903-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®