From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #4 pure magic
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 21:42:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16097.53169.687777.155890@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030607100217.GB24694@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Jörn Engel writes:
> On Sat, 7 June 2003 19:40:25 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> >
> > Your change won't affect PPP, since pppd already refuses to use
> > windowBits == 8 (as a workaround for this bug).
>
> Seems like I have misread the ppp code then. In that case, please
> remove the ppp part from the previous patch or use this one instead,
> Linus.
I meant that pppd (i.e. the user-level part of PPP) would refuse to
negotiate windowBits == 8 with the peer, so from that point of view it
doesn't matter if the kernel driver accepts it or not, since it will
never be asked to accept it (by pppd). It is better on the whole if
the kernel driver doesn't accept it since that is one less exploitable
thing in the kernel (although you would have to be root to exploit
it). But if the zlib code also refuses to use windowBits == 8, it
then doesn't matter whether the ppp_deflate code accepts it, from
either point of view.
On the whole I would say that the change to ppp-comp.h should go in,
for now at least.
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-07 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-06 18:31 [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #1 local Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 18:32 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #2 cpp Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 18:39 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #3 Z_NULL Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 18:52 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #4 casts Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 19:23 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #1 turboc Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 19:28 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #2 return code Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 20:00 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #3 inffast.c Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 20:13 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #4 pure magic Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 20:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-06-06 21:38 ` Is there a bug with su, and /dev/std*? J.C. Wren
2003-06-07 9:20 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #4 pure magic Jörn Engel
2003-06-07 9:40 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-07 10:02 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-07 11:42 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2003-06-06 18:54 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #3 Z_NULL Linus Torvalds
2003-06-06 19:13 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16097.53169.687777.155890@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®