From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #3 Z_NULL
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:13:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030606191346.GF10487@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306061151420.30453-100000@home.transmeta.com>
On Fri, 6 June 2003 11:54:45 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Jörn Engel wrote:
> >
> > How do you feel about "if (z->state->blocks != NULL)"? Remove the
> > pointless !=NULL or keep it?
>
> I don't mind it, but it doesn't buy much.
>
> It's actually in some other cases where I think there is a readability
> issue, ie in more complex conditionals I personally prefer the simpler
> cersion, ie I much prefer something like
>
> if (ptr && ptr->ops && ptr->ops->shutdown)
> ptr->ops->shutdown(ptr, xxxx);
>
> over the pointless NULL-masturbation in something like
>
> if (ptr != NULL && ptr->ops != NULL && ptr->ops->shutdown != NULL)
> ptr->ops->shutdown(ptr, xxxx)
>
> which I just is much less readable than the simple version.
Good example. The ones I found in the zlib are not that bad and I am
lazy, so I'll leave them for someone else.
Jörn
--
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that
something else is more important than fear.
-- Ambrose Redmoon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-06 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-06 18:31 [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #1 local Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 18:32 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #2 cpp Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 18:39 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #3 Z_NULL Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 18:52 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #4 casts Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 19:23 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #1 turboc Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 19:28 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #2 return code Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 20:00 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #3 inffast.c Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 20:13 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #4 pure magic Jörn Engel
2003-06-06 20:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-06-06 21:38 ` Is there a bug with su, and /dev/std*? J.C. Wren
2003-06-07 9:20 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib merge #4 pure magic Jörn Engel
2003-06-07 9:40 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-07 10:02 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-07 11:42 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-06 18:54 ` [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #3 Z_NULL Linus Torvalds
2003-06-06 19:13 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030606191346.GF10487@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--to=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®