From: "tip-bot2 for Kefeng Wang" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] locking: Make owner_on_cpu() into <linux/sched.h>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 15:15:41 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <163880374192.11128.17839358961793759820.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203075935.136808-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: c0bed69daf4b67809b58cc7cd81a8fa4f45bc161
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c0bed69daf4b67809b58cc7cd81a8fa4f45bc161
Author: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 15:59:34 +08:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Sat, 04 Dec 2021 10:56:25 +01:00
locking: Make owner_on_cpu() into <linux/sched.h>
Move the owner_on_cpu() from kernel/locking/rwsem.c into
include/linux/sched.h with under CONFIG_SMP, then use it
in the mutex/rwsem/rtmutex to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211203075935.136808-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
---
include/linux/sched.h | 9 +++++++++
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 11 ++---------
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 5 ++---
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 9 ---------
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 78c351e..ff609d9 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2171,6 +2171,15 @@ extern long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
+{
+ /*
+ * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if
+ * task is not on cpu or its cpu is preempted
+ */
+ return owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
+}
+
/* Returns effective CPU energy utilization, as seen by the scheduler */
unsigned long sched_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long max);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index db19136..5e35859 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -367,8 +367,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
/*
* Use vcpu_is_preempted to detect lock holder preemption issue.
*/
- if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() ||
- vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
+ if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched()) {
ret = false;
break;
}
@@ -403,14 +402,8 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
* structure won't go away during the spinning period.
*/
owner = __mutex_owner(lock);
-
- /*
- * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if task is not
- * on cpu or its cpu is preempted
- */
-
if (owner)
- retval = owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
+ retval = owner_on_cpu(owner);
/*
* If lock->owner is not set, the mutex has been released. Return true
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index f896208..0c1f2e3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1382,9 +1382,8 @@ static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
* for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y)
* - the VCPU on which owner runs is preempted
*/
- if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() ||
- rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter) ||
- vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
+ if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched() ||
+ rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter)) {
res = false;
break;
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index c51387a..b92d0a8 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -613,15 +613,6 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
return false;
}
-static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
-{
- /*
- * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if
- * task is not on cpu or its cpu is preempted
- */
- return owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
-}
-
static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
struct task_struct *owner;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-06 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 7:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] locking: Fix racy reads of owner->on_cpu Kefeng Wang
2021-12-03 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] locking: Make owner_on_cpu() into <linux/sched.h> Kefeng Wang
2021-12-06 15:15 ` tip-bot2 for Kefeng Wang [this message]
2021-12-03 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] locking: Mark racy reads of owner->on_cpu Kefeng Wang
2021-12-06 15:15 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Marco Elver
2021-12-03 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] locking: Fix " Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-03 15:49 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=163880374192.11128.17839358961793759820.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®