mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking: Mark racy reads of owner->on_cpu
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:59:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211203075935.136808-3-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203075935.136808-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>

One of the more frequent data races reported by KCSAN is the racy read
in mutex_spin_on_owner(), which is usually reported as "race of unknown
origin" without showing the writer. This is due to the racing write
occurring in kernel/sched. Locally enabling KCSAN in kernel/sched shows:

 | write (marked) to 0xffff97f205079934 of 4 bytes by task 316 on cpu 6:
 |  finish_task                kernel/sched/core.c:4632 [inline]
 |  finish_task_switch         kernel/sched/core.c:4848
 |  context_switch             kernel/sched/core.c:4975 [inline]
 |  __schedule                 kernel/sched/core.c:6253
 |  schedule                   kernel/sched/core.c:6326
 |  schedule_preempt_disabled  kernel/sched/core.c:6385
 |  __mutex_lock_common        kernel/locking/mutex.c:680
 |  __mutex_lock               kernel/locking/mutex.c:740 [inline]
 |  __mutex_lock_slowpath      kernel/locking/mutex.c:1028
 |  mutex_lock                 kernel/locking/mutex.c:283
 |  tty_open_by_driver         drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2062 [inline]
 |  ...
 |
 | read to 0xffff97f205079934 of 4 bytes by task 322 on cpu 3:
 |  mutex_spin_on_owner        kernel/locking/mutex.c:370
 |  mutex_optimistic_spin      kernel/locking/mutex.c:480
 |  __mutex_lock_common        kernel/locking/mutex.c:610
 |  __mutex_lock               kernel/locking/mutex.c:740 [inline]
 |  __mutex_lock_slowpath      kernel/locking/mutex.c:1028
 |  mutex_lock                 kernel/locking/mutex.c:283
 |  tty_open_by_driver         drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2062 [inline]
 |  ...
 |
 | value changed: 0x00000001 -> 0x00000000

This race is clearly intentional, and the potential for miscompilation
is slim due to surrounding barrier() and cpu_relax(), and the value
being used as a boolean.

Nevertheless, marking this reader would more clearly denote intent and
make it obvious that concurrency is expected. Use READ_ONCE() to avoid
having to reason about compiler optimizations now and in future.

With previous refactor, mark the read to owner->on_cpu in owner_on_cpu(),
which immediately precedes the loop executing mutex_spin_on_owner().

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index ff609d9c2f21..0b9b0e3f4791 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2177,7 +2177,7 @@ static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
 	 * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if
 	 * task is not on cpu or its cpu is preempted
 	 */
-	return owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
+	return READ_ONCE(owner->on_cpu) && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
 }
 
 /* Returns effective CPU energy utilization, as seen by the scheduler */
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-03  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03  7:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] locking: Fix " Kefeng Wang
2021-12-03  7:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] locking: Make owner_on_cpu() into <linux/sched.h> Kefeng Wang
2021-12-06 15:15   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Kefeng Wang
2021-12-03  7:59 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2021-12-06 15:15   ` [tip: locking/core] locking: Mark racy reads of owner->on_cpu tip-bot2 for Marco Elver
2021-12-03  8:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] locking: Fix " Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-03 15:49 ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211203075935.136808-3-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®