From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking: Mark racy reads of owner->on_cpu
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:59:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211203075935.136808-3-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203075935.136808-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
One of the more frequent data races reported by KCSAN is the racy read
in mutex_spin_on_owner(), which is usually reported as "race of unknown
origin" without showing the writer. This is due to the racing write
occurring in kernel/sched. Locally enabling KCSAN in kernel/sched shows:
| write (marked) to 0xffff97f205079934 of 4 bytes by task 316 on cpu 6:
| finish_task kernel/sched/core.c:4632 [inline]
| finish_task_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4848
| context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4975 [inline]
| __schedule kernel/sched/core.c:6253
| schedule kernel/sched/core.c:6326
| schedule_preempt_disabled kernel/sched/core.c:6385
| __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:680
| __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:740 [inline]
| __mutex_lock_slowpath kernel/locking/mutex.c:1028
| mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:283
| tty_open_by_driver drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2062 [inline]
| ...
|
| read to 0xffff97f205079934 of 4 bytes by task 322 on cpu 3:
| mutex_spin_on_owner kernel/locking/mutex.c:370
| mutex_optimistic_spin kernel/locking/mutex.c:480
| __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:610
| __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:740 [inline]
| __mutex_lock_slowpath kernel/locking/mutex.c:1028
| mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:283
| tty_open_by_driver drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2062 [inline]
| ...
|
| value changed: 0x00000001 -> 0x00000000
This race is clearly intentional, and the potential for miscompilation
is slim due to surrounding barrier() and cpu_relax(), and the value
being used as a boolean.
Nevertheless, marking this reader would more clearly denote intent and
make it obvious that concurrency is expected. Use READ_ONCE() to avoid
having to reason about compiler optimizations now and in future.
With previous refactor, mark the read to owner->on_cpu in owner_on_cpu(),
which immediately precedes the loop executing mutex_spin_on_owner().
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index ff609d9c2f21..0b9b0e3f4791 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2177,7 +2177,7 @@ static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
* As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if
* task is not on cpu or its cpu is preempted
*/
- return owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
+ return READ_ONCE(owner->on_cpu) && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
}
/* Returns effective CPU energy utilization, as seen by the scheduler */
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 7:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] locking: Fix " Kefeng Wang
2021-12-03 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] locking: Make owner_on_cpu() into <linux/sched.h> Kefeng Wang
2021-12-06 15:15 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Kefeng Wang
2021-12-03 7:59 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2021-12-06 15:15 ` [tip: locking/core] locking: Mark racy reads of owner->on_cpu tip-bot2 for Marco Elver
2021-12-03 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] locking: Fix " Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-03 15:49 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211203075935.136808-3-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®