mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] locking: Make owner_on_cpu() into <linux/sched.h>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:59:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211203075935.136808-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203075935.136808-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

Move the owner_on_cpu() from kernel/locking/rwsem.c into
include/linux/sched.h with under CONFIG_SMP, then use it
in the mutex/rwsem/rtmutex to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h    |  9 +++++++++
 kernel/locking/mutex.c   | 11 ++---------
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c |  5 ++---
 kernel/locking/rwsem.c   |  9 ---------
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 78c351e35fec..ff609d9c2f21 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2171,6 +2171,15 @@ extern long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask);
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
+{
+	/*
+	 * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if
+	 * task is not on cpu or its cpu is preempted
+	 */
+	return owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
+}
+
 /* Returns effective CPU energy utilization, as seen by the scheduler */
 unsigned long sched_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long max);
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index db1913611192..5e3585950ec8 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -367,8 +367,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
 		/*
 		 * Use vcpu_is_preempted to detect lock holder preemption issue.
 		 */
-		if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() ||
-				vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
+		if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched()) {
 			ret = false;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -403,14 +402,8 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
 	 * structure won't go away during the spinning period.
 	 */
 	owner = __mutex_owner(lock);
-
-	/*
-	 * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if task is not
-	 * on cpu or its cpu is preempted
-	 */
-
 	if (owner)
-		retval = owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
+		retval = owner_on_cpu(owner);
 
 	/*
 	 * If lock->owner is not set, the mutex has been released. Return true
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 0c6a48dfcecb..41152e8e799a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1379,9 +1379,8 @@ static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 		 *    for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y)
 		 *  - the VCPU on which owner runs is preempted
 		 */
-		if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() ||
-		    rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter) ||
-		    vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
+		if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched() ||
+		    rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter)) {
 			res = false;
 			break;
 		}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 04a74d040a6d..69aba4abe104 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -658,15 +658,6 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
-{
-	/*
-	 * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if
-	 * task is not on cpu or its cpu is preempted
-	 */
-	return owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
-}
-
 static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	struct task_struct *owner;
-- 
2.26.2


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-03  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03  7:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] locking: Fix racy reads of owner->on_cpu Kefeng Wang
2021-12-03  7:59 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2021-12-06 15:15   ` [tip: locking/core] locking: Make owner_on_cpu() into <linux/sched.h> tip-bot2 for Kefeng Wang
2021-12-03  7:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] locking: Mark racy reads of owner->on_cpu Kefeng Wang
2021-12-06 15:15   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Marco Elver
2021-12-03  8:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] locking: Fix " Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-03 15:49 ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211203075935.136808-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®