Re: [PATCH 11/13] locking/qspinlock: Use queued_spin_trylock in pv_hybrid_queued_unfair_trylock

[Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>]

Excerpts from Waiman Long's message of July 6, 2022 6:15 am:
> On 7/4/22 10:38, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Rather than open-code it as necessitated by the old function-renaming
>> code generation that rendered queued_spin_trylock unavailable to use
>> here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
>> index cef0ca7d94e1..9db168753124 100644
>> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
>> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
>> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static inline bool pv_hybrid_queued_unfair_trylock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>>   		int val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
>>   
>>   		if (!(val & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) &&
>> -		   (cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->locked, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) == 0)) {
>> +				queued_spin_trylock(lock)) {
>>   			lockevent_inc(pv_lock_stealing);
>>   			return true;
>>   		}
> 
> I am not sure if the compiler will eliminate the duplicated 
> atomic_read() in queued_spin_trylock(). So unless it can generate the 
> same code, I would prefer to leave this alone.

Ah you're right, I had that read removed in my tree but then dropped
that change before submitting. This should have been dropped as well.

Thanks,
Nick