mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] locking/qspinlock: simplify code generation
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 19:59:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsR8BIyrSCQ8AlEo@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220704143820.3071004-1-npiggin@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 12:38:07AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Been recently looking a bit closer at queued spinlock code, and
> found it's a little tricky to follow especially the pv generation.
> This series tries to improve the situation. It's not well tested
> outside powerpc, but it's really the x86 pv code that is the
> other major complexity that should need some review and testing.
> Opinions?

perhaps something like so on top/instead? This would still allow
slotting in other implementations with relative ease and the compilers
should constant fold all this.

--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static void pv_kick_node(struct qspinloc
  *
  * The current value of the lock will be returned for additional processing.
  */
-static void pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, struct qnode *node)
+static u32 pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, struct qnode *node)
 {
 	struct qspinlock **lp = NULL;
 	int waitcnt = 0;
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static void pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct
 		set_pending(lock);
 		for (loop = SPIN_THRESHOLD; loop; loop--) {
 			if (trylock_clear_pending(lock))
-				return; /* got lock */
+				goto out; /* got lock */
 			cpu_relax();
 		}
 		clear_pending(lock);
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ static void pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct
 				 */
 				WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
 				WRITE_ONCE(*lp, NULL);
-				return; /* got lock */
+				goto out; /* got lock */
 			}
 		}
 		WRITE_ONCE(node->state, vcpu_hashed);
@@ -683,12 +683,22 @@ static void pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct
 		 */
 	}
 
+out:
 	/*
 	 * The cmpxchg() or xchg() call before coming here provides the
 	 * acquire semantics for locking.
 	 */
+	return atomic_read(&lock->val);
 }
 
+static const struct queue_ops pv_ops = {
+	.init_node		= pv_init_node,
+	.trylock		= pv_hybrid_queued_unfair_trylock,
+	.wait_node		= pv_wait_node,
+	.wait_head_or_lock	= pv_wait_head_or_lock,
+	.kick_node		= pv_kick_node,
+};
+
 /*
  * PV versions of the unlock fastpath and slowpath functions to be used
  * instead of queued_spin_unlock().
@@ -756,18 +766,18 @@ __visible void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(s
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__pv_queued_spin_unlock);
 #endif
 
-#else /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */
-static __always_inline void pv_init_node(struct qnode *node) { }
-static __always_inline void pv_wait_node(struct qnode *node,
-					 struct qnode *prev) { }
-static __always_inline void pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock,
-					 struct qnode *node) { }
-static __always_inline void pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
-						 struct qnode *node) { }
-static __always_inline bool pv_hybrid_queued_unfair_trylock(struct qspinlock *lock) { BUILD_BUG(); }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */
 
-static inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, bool paravirt)
+struct queue_ops {
+	void (*init_node)(struct qnode *node);
+	bool (*trylock)(struct qspinlock *lock);
+	void (*wait_node)(struct qnode *node, struct qnode *prev);
+	u32 (*wait_head_or_lock)(struct qspinlock *lock, struct qnode *node);
+	void (*kick_node)(struct qspinlock *lock, struct qnode *node);
+};
+
+static __always_inline
+void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, const struct queue_ops *ops)
 {
 	struct qnode *prev, *next, *node;
 	u32 val, old, tail;
@@ -813,16 +823,16 @@ static inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_
 
 	node->locked = 0;
 	node->next = NULL;
-	if (paravirt)
-		pv_init_node(node);
+	if (ops && ops->init_node)
+		ops->init_node(node);
 
 	/*
 	 * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline in the per-cpu queue node;
 	 * attempt the trylock once more in the hope someone let go while we
 	 * weren't watching.
 	 */
-	if (paravirt) {
-		if (pv_hybrid_queued_unfair_trylock(lock))
+	if (ops && ops->trylock) {
+		if (ops->trylock(lock))
 			goto release;
 	} else {
 		if (queued_spin_trylock(lock))
@@ -857,8 +867,8 @@ static inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_
 		WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);
 
 		/* Wait for mcs node lock to be released */
-		if (paravirt)
-			pv_wait_node(node, prev);
+		if (ops && ops->wait_node)
+			ops->wait_node(node, prev);
 		else
 			smp_cond_load_acquire(&node->locked, VAL);
 
@@ -893,12 +903,11 @@ static inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_
 	 * If PV isn't active, 0 will be returned instead.
 	 *
 	 */
-	if (paravirt) {
-		pv_wait_head_or_lock(lock, node);
-		val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+	if (ops && ops->wait_head_or_lock) {
+		val = ops->wait_head_or_lock(lock, node);
 	} else {
 		val = atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val,
-				!(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK));
+					       !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK));
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -1049,14 +1058,14 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qs
 	 */
 queue:
 	lockevent_inc(lock_slowpath);
-	queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, false);
+	queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, NULL);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
 void __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
 {
-	queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, true);
+	queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, &pv_ops);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-05 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-04 14:38 Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 01/13] locking/qspinlock: remove pv_node abstraction Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-06 23:23   ` Boqun Feng
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 02/13] locking/qspinlock: inline mcs_spinlock functions into qspinlock Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-05 16:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-12  0:06     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 03/13] locking/qspinlock: split common mcs queueing code into its own function Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-05 17:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-12  0:10     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 04/13] locking/qspinlock: move pv lock word helpers into qspinlock.c Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-05 19:34   ` Waiman Long
2022-07-12  0:11     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 05/13] locking/qspinlock: be less clever with the preprocessor Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-05 17:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-12  0:29     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-05 20:02   ` Waiman Long
2022-07-12  0:33     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 06/13] locking/qspinlock: merge qspinlock_paravirt.h into qspinlock.c Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-05 17:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-05 17:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-12  0:46       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-06 13:35     ` Waiman Long
2022-07-06 14:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 07/13] locking/qspinlock: remove arch qspinlock_paravirt.h includes Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 08/13] locking/qspinlock: stop renaming queued_spin_lock_slowpath to native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-05 17:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 09/13] locking/qspinlock: rename __pv_init_lock_hash to pv_spinlocks_init Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 10/13] locking/qspinlock: paravirt use simple trylock in case idx overflows Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 11/13] locking/qspinlock: Use queued_spin_trylock in pv_hybrid_queued_unfair_trylock Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-05 17:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-05 20:15   ` Waiman Long
2022-07-12  0:48     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 12/13] locking/qspinlock: separate pv_wait_node from the non-paravirt path Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-05 17:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-12  0:50     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-04 14:38 ` [PATCH 13/13] locking/qspinlock: simplify pv_wait_head_or_lock calling scheme Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-05 17:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-07-12  0:56   ` [PATCH 00/13] locking/qspinlock: simplify code generation Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YsR8BIyrSCQ8AlEo@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®