From: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Simon Derr <Simon.Derr@bull.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:48:22 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17189.27398.848822.787487@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050912113030.15934.9433.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com>
Paul Jackson writes:
[...]
>
> static inline void cpuset_down(struct semaphore *psem)
> {
> - if (current->cpuset_sem_nest_depth == 0)
> + if (cpuset_sem_owner != current) {
> down(psem);
> - current->cpuset_sem_nest_depth++;
> + cpuset_sem_owner = current;
> + }
> + cpuset_sem_depth++;
> }
Err... note that now cpuset_{down,up}() take semaphore as a parameter,
but use global cpuset_sem_{owner,depth} to track recursion. This, I
believe, is an inconsistent API---it only works for a single semaphore
as passing different @psem's would lead to deadlocks and meaningless
owner and depth.
What about making these functions
static void cpuset_{down,up}(void);
operating on cpuset_sem internally?
"I won't rest till it's the best ..." :-)
Nikita.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-12 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-12 11:30 Paul Jackson
2005-09-12 11:39 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-12 14:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-12 15:32 ` Paul Jackson
[not found] ` <17189.39100.862561.865802@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
2005-09-12 15:38 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-13 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-09-13 22:21 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-12 14:51 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-12 17:07 ` Roman Zippel
[not found] ` <20050912153135.3812d8e2.pj@sgi.com>
2005-09-13 11:42 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-13 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-14 6:01 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-14 15:56 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-14 19:46 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-15 10:51 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-15 17:45 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-15 19:18 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-17 2:06 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-17 2:27 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-20 7:57 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-20 12:05 ` Robin Holt
2005-09-20 12:21 ` Robin Holt
2005-09-20 13:10 ` Simon Derr
2005-09-20 14:22 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-20 14:54 ` Robin Holt
2005-09-20 15:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 15:14 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-20 15:17 ` Simon Derr
2005-09-12 11:48 ` Nikita Danilov [this message]
2005-09-12 13:25 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17189.27398.848822.787487@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=nikita@clusterfs.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®