From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org, akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nikita@clusterfs.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:05:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050920120523.GC21435@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050920005743.4ea5f224.pj@sgi.com>
Paul,
Can you give a _short_ explanation of why notify_on_release is
essential? Could the intent be accomplished with something
like destroy on exit which then goes through and does the
remove of shildren and finally removes the cpuset?
If we can agree on that, then the exit path becomes
if (atomic_dec_and_lock(¤t->cpuset.refcount)) {
/* Code to remove children. */
}
which no longer needs to call a usermode helper and is _FAR_
better in my personal biased opinion.
Thanks,
Robin
PS: For reference, here is what /sbin/cpuset_release_agent
looks like:
[holt@attica:sbin] cat cpuset_release_agent
#!/bin/sh
# Do not modify this file /sbin/cpuset_release_agent.
#
# It is invoked directly from the kernel's call_usermodehelper()
# routine, whenever the last user of cpuset goes away, if that
# cpuset had its 'notify_on_release' option set to '1'. This
# cpuset_release_agent script is responsible for removing the
# abandoned cpuset, whose cpuset file system path is passed
# in argv[1].
rmdir /dev/cpuset/$1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-20 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-12 11:30 Paul Jackson
2005-09-12 11:39 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-12 14:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-12 15:32 ` Paul Jackson
[not found] ` <17189.39100.862561.865802@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
2005-09-12 15:38 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-13 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-09-13 22:21 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-12 14:51 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-12 17:07 ` Roman Zippel
[not found] ` <20050912153135.3812d8e2.pj@sgi.com>
2005-09-13 11:42 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-13 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-14 6:01 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-14 15:56 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-14 19:46 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-15 10:51 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-15 17:45 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-15 19:18 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-17 2:06 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-17 2:27 ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-20 7:57 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-20 12:05 ` Robin Holt [this message]
2005-09-20 12:21 ` Robin Holt
2005-09-20 13:10 ` Simon Derr
2005-09-20 14:22 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-20 14:54 ` Robin Holt
2005-09-20 15:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-20 15:14 ` Paul Jackson
2005-09-20 15:17 ` Simon Derr
2005-09-12 11:48 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-09-12 13:25 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050920120523.GC21435@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com \
--to=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikita@clusterfs.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®