Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize

[Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>]

Nikita wrote:
> static void cpuset_{down,up}(void);

I started with (void) calls when I first wrote this hack,
then changed it to taking a semaphore pointer, intentionally.

The calls:
	cpuset_down(&cpuset_sem);
	cpuset_up(&cpuset_sem);
exactly replace calls:
	down(&cpuset_sem);
	up(&cpuset_sem);

I wanted that visual resemblance.

I agree, it's asymmetric, which is not so good.

But the resemblance is more valuable, in my view.

So I will stick with what I've got, unless I see stronger
signs of a concensus to the contrary.

Is that ok?

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401