From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: autofs4 looks up wrong path element when ghosting is enabled
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:09:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17203.7543.949262.883138@segfault.boston.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509210916040.26144@wombat.indigo.net.au>
==> Regarding Re: autofs4 looks up wrong path element when ghosting is enabled; Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> adds:
raven> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Hi, Ian, list,
>>
>> I have a bug filed against autofs when ghosting is enabled. The best way
>> to describe the bug is to walk through the reproducer, I guess.
>>
>> Take the following maps, for example:
>>
>> auto.master
>> /sbox auto.sbox
>>
>> auto.sbox:
>> src segfault:/sbox/src/
>>
>> Let's say that there is a file, id3_0.12.orig.tar.gz, in segfault:/sbox/src/.
>>
>> To reproduce the problem, stop the nfs service on the server.
>>
>> On the client, do an 'ls /sbox/src/id3_012.orig.tar.gz'. This will fail,
>> as well it should. However, if we look in the logs, we find this:
>>
>> automount[1182]: handle_packet_missing: token 1, name src
>> automount[1182]: attempting to mount entry /sbox/src
>> ...
>> automount[1481]: mount(nfs): calling mkdir_path /sbox/src
>> automount[1481]: mount(nfs): calling mount -t nfs -s-o tcp,intr,timeo=600,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,retrans=5 segfault:/sbox/src /sbox/src
>> automount[1481]: >> mount: RPC: Program not registered
>> automount[1481]: mount(nfs): add_bad_host: segfault:/sbox/src
>> automount[1481]: mount(nfs): nfs: mount failure segfault:/sbox/src on /sbox/src
>> automount[1481]: failed to mount /sbox/src
>> ...
>> automount[1182]: send_fail: token=1
>> automount[1182]: handle_packet: type = 0
>> automount[1182]: handle_packet_missing: token 2, name src/id3_0.12.orig.tar.gz
>> automount[1182]: attempting to mount entry /sbox/src/id3_0.12.orig.tar.gz
>>
>> Noteworthy are these last two lines! Even though the mount failed, we are
>> continuing the lookup. The culprit is here, in cached_lookup:
>>
>> if (!dentry->d_op->d_revalidate(dentry, flags) && !d_invalidate(dentry)) {
>> dput(dentry);
>> dentry = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> d_revalidate points to autofs4_revalidate, which calls try_to_fill_dentry,
>> which will return a status of 0. Since ghosting is enabled,
>> d_invalidate(dentry) will return -EBUSY, and so we return the dentry to
raven> the
>> caller, which then continues the lookup.
>>
>> Ian, I'm not really sure how we can address this issue without VFS
>> changes. Any ideas?
>>
raven> I'm aware of this problem.
raven> I'm not sure how to deal with it yet.
raven> The case above is probably not that difficult to solve but if the last
raven> component is a directory it's hard to work out it's a problem.
Ugh. If you're thinking what I think you're thinking, that's an ugly hack.
raven> There's more information here than I've gathhered so far.
>> Oh, also note that, once the nfs service is started up again on the server,
>> the lookup of a specific file name will still fail! In this case, the
>> daemon won't even be called.
raven> I'll have to check this out.
raven> It could be helpful.
Well, I've provided a reproducer. If you'd like log output from the kernel
side, let me know. I can certainly provide that.
-Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-22 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-20 19:02 Jeff Moyer
2005-09-21 1:25 ` Ian Kent
2005-09-22 21:09 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2005-09-24 8:59 ` Ian Kent
2005-09-24 20:51 ` Jeff Moyer
2005-09-25 1:25 ` Ian Kent
2005-09-26 15:14 ` Jeff Moyer
2005-09-27 4:21 ` Ian Kent
2005-09-26 20:57 ` Jeff Moyer
2005-09-27 4:34 ` Ian Kent
2005-10-08 5:43 ` Ian Kent
2005-10-08 12:50 ` Jeff Moyer
2005-10-09 4:29 ` Ian Kent
2005-10-15 12:30 ` Ian Kent
2005-10-19 20:49 ` Jeff Moyer
2005-10-20 0:50 ` Ian Kent
2005-10-29 7:42 ` Ian Kent
2005-10-31 11:33 ` Jeff Moyer
2005-10-31 13:27 ` Ian Kent
2005-11-05 9:50 ` [autofs] " Ian Kent
2005-11-10 23:51 ` Jeff Moyer
2005-11-11 14:53 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17203.7543.949262.883138@segfault.boston.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®