mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Alexandre Chartre" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: objtool/core] objtool/x86: objtool can confuse memory and stack access
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 11:49:24 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <172043936454.2215.16620277258416300859.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240620144747.2524805-1-alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>

The following commit has been merged into the objtool/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     8e366d83edce3065ff3372bedc281c5e217c0550
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/8e366d83edce3065ff3372bedc281c5e217c0550
Author:        Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:47:47 +02:00
Committer:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 23:40:54 -07:00

objtool/x86: objtool can confuse memory and stack access

The encoding of an x86 instruction can include a ModR/M and a SIB
(Scale-Index-Base) byte to describe the addressing mode of the
instruction.

objtool processes all addressing mode with a SIB base of 5 as having
%rbp as the base register. However, a SIB base of 5 means that the
effective address has either no base (if ModR/M mod is zero) or %rbp
as the base (if ModR/M mod is 1 or 2). This can cause objtool to confuse
an absolute address access with a stack operation.

For example, objtool will see the following instruction:

 4c 8b 24 25 e0 ff ff    mov    0xffffffffffffffe0,%r12

as a stack operation (i.e. similar to: mov -0x20(%rbp), %r12).

[Note that this kind of weird absolute address access is added by the
 compiler when using KASAN.]

If this perceived stack operation happens to reference the location
where %r12 was pushed on the stack then the objtool validation will
think that %r12 is being restored and this can cause a stack state
mismatch.

This kind behavior was seen on xfs code, after a minor change (convert
kmem_alloc() to kmalloc()):

>> fs/xfs/xfs.o: warning: objtool: xfs_da_grow_inode_int+0x6c1: stack state mismatch: reg1[12]=-2-48 reg2[12]=-1+0

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402220435.MGN0EV6l-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240620144747.2524805-1-alexandre.chartre@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
---
 tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
index 3a1d80a..ed6bff0 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
@@ -125,8 +125,14 @@ bool arch_pc_relative_reloc(struct reloc *reloc)
 #define is_RIP()   ((modrm_rm & 7) == CFI_BP && modrm_mod == 0)
 #define have_SIB() ((modrm_rm & 7) == CFI_SP && mod_is_mem())
 
+/*
+ * Check the ModRM register. If there is a SIB byte then check with
+ * the SIB base register. But if the SIB base is 5 (i.e. CFI_BP) and
+ * ModRM mod is 0 then there is no base register.
+ */
 #define rm_is(reg) (have_SIB() ? \
-		    sib_base == (reg) && sib_index == CFI_SP : \
+		    sib_base == (reg) && sib_index == CFI_SP && \
+		    (sib_base != CFI_BP || modrm_mod != 0) :	\
 		    modrm_rm == (reg))
 
 #define rm_is_mem(reg)	(mod_is_mem() && !is_RIP() && rm_is(reg))

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-08 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-20 14:47 [PATCH V2 RESEND] " Alexandre Chartre
2024-07-03  6:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-07-08 11:49 ` tip-bot2 for Alexandre Chartre [this message]
2024-07-08 16:48   ` [tip: objtool/core] " Borislav Petkov
2024-07-09  8:00     ` Alexandre Chartre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=172043936454.2215.16620277258416300859.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®