From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tkhai@ya.ru
Subject: [PATCH NET-PREV 04/51] net: Extract some code from __rtnl_newlink() to separate func
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:38:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174265430298.356712.7238852286966358693.stgit@pro.pro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <174265415457.356712.10472727127735290090.stgit@pro.pro>
The patch is preparation in rtnetlink code for using nd_lock.
This is a step to move dereference of tb[IFLA_MASTER] up
to where main dev is dereferenced by ifi_index.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
---
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index a5af69af235f..6da137f1a764 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -3563,6 +3563,80 @@ struct rtnl_newlink_tbs {
struct nlattr *slave_attr[RTNL_SLAVE_MAX_TYPE + 1];
};
+static int __rtnl_newlink_setlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
+ struct rtnl_newlink_tbs *tbs,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ struct net *target_net, struct net_device *dev,
+ const struct rtnl_link_ops *ops,
+ struct nlattr **linkinfo, struct nlattr **data)
+{
+ const struct rtnl_link_ops *m_ops = NULL;
+ struct ifinfomsg *ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
+ struct nlattr ** const tb = tbs->tb;
+ struct nlattr **slave_data = NULL;
+ struct net_device *master_dev;
+ int err, status = 0;
+
+ if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL)
+ return -EEXIST;
+ if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ err = validate_linkmsg(dev, tb, extack);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ master_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev);
+ if (master_dev)
+ m_ops = master_dev->rtnl_link_ops;
+
+ if (m_ops) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ if (m_ops->slave_maxtype > RTNL_SLAVE_MAX_TYPE)
+ goto out;
+
+ if (m_ops->slave_maxtype &&
+ linkinfo[IFLA_INFO_SLAVE_DATA]) {
+ err = nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tbs->slave_attr,
+ m_ops->slave_maxtype,
+ linkinfo[IFLA_INFO_SLAVE_DATA],
+ m_ops->slave_policy,
+ extack);
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto out;
+ slave_data = tbs->slave_attr;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (linkinfo[IFLA_INFO_DATA]) {
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (!ops || ops != dev->rtnl_link_ops ||
+ !ops->changelink)
+ goto out;
+
+ err = ops->changelink(dev, tb, data, extack);
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto out;
+ status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY;
+ }
+
+ if (linkinfo[IFLA_INFO_SLAVE_DATA]) {
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (!m_ops || !m_ops->slave_changelink)
+ goto out;
+
+ err = m_ops->slave_changelink(master_dev, dev, tb,
+ slave_data, extack);
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto out;
+ status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY;
+ }
+
+ err = do_setlink(target_net, skb, dev, ifm, extack, tb, status);
+out:
+ return err;
+}
+
static int __rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct rtnl_newlink_tbs *tbs,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
@@ -3570,11 +3644,8 @@ static int __rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
{
struct nlattr *linkinfo[IFLA_INFO_MAX + 1];
struct nlattr ** const tb = tbs->tb;
- const struct rtnl_link_ops *m_ops;
- struct net_device *master_dev;
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
const struct rtnl_link_ops *ops;
- struct nlattr **slave_data;
char kind[MODULE_NAME_LEN];
struct net_device *dev;
struct ifinfomsg *ifm;
@@ -3585,29 +3656,6 @@ static int __rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
replay:
#endif
- ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
- if (ifm->ifi_index > 0) {
- link_specified = true;
- dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifm->ifi_index);
- } else if (ifm->ifi_index < 0) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ifindex can't be negative");
- return -EINVAL;
- } else if (tb[IFLA_IFNAME] || tb[IFLA_ALT_IFNAME]) {
- link_specified = true;
- dev = rtnl_dev_get(net, tb);
- } else {
- link_specified = false;
- dev = NULL;
- }
-
- master_dev = NULL;
- m_ops = NULL;
- if (dev) {
- master_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev);
- if (master_dev)
- m_ops = master_dev->rtnl_link_ops;
- }
-
if (tb[IFLA_LINKINFO]) {
err = nla_parse_nested_deprecated(linkinfo, IFLA_INFO_MAX,
tb[IFLA_LINKINFO],
@@ -3645,59 +3693,26 @@ static int __rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
}
}
- slave_data = NULL;
- if (m_ops) {
- if (m_ops->slave_maxtype > RTNL_SLAVE_MAX_TYPE)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (m_ops->slave_maxtype &&
- linkinfo[IFLA_INFO_SLAVE_DATA]) {
- err = nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tbs->slave_attr,
- m_ops->slave_maxtype,
- linkinfo[IFLA_INFO_SLAVE_DATA],
- m_ops->slave_policy,
- extack);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
- slave_data = tbs->slave_attr;
- }
+ ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
+ if (ifm->ifi_index > 0) {
+ link_specified = true;
+ dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifm->ifi_index);
+ } else if (ifm->ifi_index < 0) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ifindex can't be negative");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else if (tb[IFLA_IFNAME] || tb[IFLA_ALT_IFNAME]) {
+ link_specified = true;
+ dev = rtnl_dev_get(net, tb);
+ } else {
+ link_specified = false;
+ dev = NULL;
}
if (dev) {
- int status = 0;
-
- if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL)
- return -EEXIST;
- if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
- err = validate_linkmsg(dev, tb, extack);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
-
- if (linkinfo[IFLA_INFO_DATA]) {
- if (!ops || ops != dev->rtnl_link_ops ||
- !ops->changelink)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
- err = ops->changelink(dev, tb, data, extack);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
- status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY;
- }
-
- if (linkinfo[IFLA_INFO_SLAVE_DATA]) {
- if (!m_ops || !m_ops->slave_changelink)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
- err = m_ops->slave_changelink(master_dev, dev, tb,
- slave_data, extack);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
- status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY;
- }
-
- return do_setlink(target_net, skb, dev, ifm, extack, tb, status);
+ err = __rtnl_newlink_setlink(skb, nlh, tbs, extack,
+ target_net, dev,
+ ops, linkinfo, data);
+ return err;
}
if (!(nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_CREATE)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-22 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-22 14:37 [PATCH NET-PREV 00/51] Kill rtnl_lock using fine-grained nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:37 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 01/51] net: Move some checks from __rtnl_newlink() to caller Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 02/51] net: Add nlaattr check to rtnl_link_get_net_capable() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 03/51] net: do_setlink() refactoring: move target_net acquiring to callers Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 05/51] net: Move dereference of tb[IFLA_MASTER] up Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 06/51] net: Use unregister_netdevice_many() for both error cases in rtnl_newlink_create() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 07/51] net: Introduce nd_lock and primitives to work with it Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 08/51] net: Initially attaching and detaching nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 09/51] net: Use register_netdevice() in loopback() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 10/51] net: Underline newlink and changelink dependencies Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 11/51] net: Make master and slaves (any dependent devices) share the same nd_lock in .setlink etc Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 12/51] net: Use __register_netdevice in trivial .newlink cases Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 13/51] infiniband_ipoib: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 14/51] vxcan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 15/51] iavf: Use __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 16/51] geneve: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 17/51] netkit: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 18/51] qmi_wwan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 19/51] bpqether: Provide determined context in __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 20/51] ppp: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 21/51] veth: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 22/51] vxlan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 23/51] hdlc_fr: Use __register_netdevice Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 24/51] lapbeth: Provide determined context in __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 25/51] wwan: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 26/51] 6lowpan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 27/51] vlan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 28/51] dsa: Use __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 29/51] ip6gre: Use __register_netdevice() in .changelink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 30/51] ip6_tunnel: Use __register_netdevice() in .newlink and .changelink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 31/51] ip6_vti: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 32/51] ip6_sit: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 33/51] net: Now check nobody calls register_netdevice() with nd_lock attached Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 34/51] dsa: Make all switch tree ports relate to same nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 35/51] cfg80211: Use fallback_nd_lock for registered devices Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 36/51] ieee802154: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 37/51] net: Introduce delayed event work Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 38/51] failover: Link master and slave under nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 39/51] netvsc: Make joined device to share master's nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 40/51] openvswitch: Make ports share nd_lock of master device Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 41/51] bridge: Make port to have the same nd_lock as bridge Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 42/51] bond: Make master and slave relate to the same nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 43/51] net: Now check nobody calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link() without nd_lock attached Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 44/51] net: Call dellink with nd_lock is held Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 45/51] t7xx: Use __unregister_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 46/51] 6lowpan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 47/51] netvsc: Call dev_change_net_namespace() under nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 48/51] default_device: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 49/51] ieee802154: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:44 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 50/51] cfg80211: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:44 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 51/51] net: Make all NETDEV_REGISTER events to be called " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-24 2:51 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 00/51] Kill rtnl_lock using fine-grained nd_lock Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 11:15 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174265430298.356712.7238852286966358693.stgit@pro.pro \
--to=tkhai@ya.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®