From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tkhai@ya.ru
Subject: [PATCH NET-PREV 05/51] net: Move dereference of tb[IFLA_MASTER] up
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:38:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174265431086.356712.17422975834795735079.stgit@pro.pro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <174265415457.356712.10472727127735290090.stgit@pro.pro>
...to where main dev is dereferenced by ifi_index.
The patch is preparation in rtnetlink code for using nd_lock.
Having dereference of dev and master in same places allow
to double lock them the same time.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
---
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 6da137f1a764..a33b60d1de2d 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -2675,7 +2675,7 @@ static int do_setvfinfo(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr **tb)
return err;
}
-static int do_set_master(struct net_device *dev, int ifindex,
+static int do_set_master(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *master,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct net_device *upper_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev);
@@ -2683,7 +2683,7 @@ static int do_set_master(struct net_device *dev, int ifindex,
int err;
if (upper_dev) {
- if (upper_dev->ifindex == ifindex)
+ if (upper_dev == master)
return 0;
ops = upper_dev->netdev_ops;
if (ops->ndo_del_slave) {
@@ -2695,10 +2695,8 @@ static int do_set_master(struct net_device *dev, int ifindex,
}
}
- if (ifindex) {
- upper_dev = __dev_get_by_index(dev_net(dev), ifindex);
- if (!upper_dev)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (master) {
+ upper_dev = master;
ops = upper_dev->netdev_ops;
if (ops->ndo_add_slave) {
err = ops->ndo_add_slave(upper_dev, dev, extack);
@@ -2775,7 +2773,8 @@ static int do_set_proto_down(struct net_device *dev,
/* notify flag means notify + modified. */
#define DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY 0x03
static int do_setlink(struct net *net, const struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct net_device *dev, struct ifinfomsg *ifm,
+ struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *master,
+ struct ifinfomsg *ifm,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
struct nlattr **tb, int status)
{
@@ -2897,8 +2896,8 @@ static int do_setlink(struct net *net, const struct sk_buff *skb,
goto errout;
}
- if (tb[IFLA_MASTER]) {
- err = do_set_master(dev, nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_MASTER]), extack);
+ if (master) {
+ err = do_set_master(dev, master, extack);
if (err)
goto errout;
status |= DO_SETLINK_MODIFIED;
@@ -3156,12 +3155,24 @@ static struct net_device *rtnl_dev_get(struct net *net,
return __dev_get_by_name(net, ifname);
}
+static struct net_device *rtnl_master_get(struct net *net, struct nlattr *tb[])
+{
+ struct net_device *master;
+
+ if (!tb[IFLA_MASTER])
+ return NULL;
+ master = __dev_get_by_index(net, nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_MASTER]));
+ if (!master)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ return master;
+}
+
static int rtnl_setlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
struct ifinfomsg *ifm;
- struct net_device *dev;
+ struct net_device *dev, *master = NULL;
struct net *target_net = NULL;
int err;
struct nlattr *tb[IFLA_MAX+1];
@@ -3196,11 +3207,17 @@ static int rtnl_setlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
goto errout;
}
+ master = rtnl_master_get(target_net ? : net, tb);
+ if (IS_ERR(master)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto errout;
+ }
+
err = validate_linkmsg(dev, tb, extack);
if (err < 0)
goto errout;
- err = do_setlink(target_net, skb, dev, ifm, extack, tb, 0);
+ err = do_setlink(target_net, skb, dev, master, ifm, extack, tb, 0);
errout:
if (target_net)
put_net(target_net);
@@ -3440,7 +3457,7 @@ static int rtnl_group_changelink(const struct sk_buff *skb,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
struct nlattr **tb)
{
- struct net_device *dev, *aux;
+ struct net_device *dev, *aux, *master = NULL;
struct net *target_net;
int err;
@@ -3451,12 +3468,18 @@ static int rtnl_group_changelink(const struct sk_buff *skb,
goto out;
}
+ master = rtnl_master_get(target_net ? : net, tb);
+ if (IS_ERR(master)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
for_each_netdev_safe(net, dev, aux) {
if (dev->group == group) {
err = validate_linkmsg(dev, tb, extack);
if (err < 0)
break;
- err = do_setlink(target_net, skb, dev, ifm, extack, tb, 0);
+ err = do_setlink(target_net, skb, dev, master, ifm, extack, tb, 0);
if (err < 0)
break;
}
@@ -3478,7 +3501,7 @@ static int rtnl_newlink_create(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ifinfomsg *ifm,
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
u32 portid = NETLINK_CB(skb).portid;
struct net *link_net;
- struct net_device *dev;
+ struct net_device *dev, *master = NULL;
char ifname[IFNAMSIZ];
int err;
@@ -3519,6 +3542,12 @@ static int rtnl_newlink_create(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ifinfomsg *ifm,
dev->ifindex = ifm->ifi_index;
+ master = rtnl_master_get(link_net ? : dest_net, tb);
+ if (IS_ERR(master)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
if (ops->newlink)
err = ops->newlink(link_net ? : net, dev, tb, data, extack);
else
@@ -3536,8 +3565,8 @@ static int rtnl_newlink_create(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ifinfomsg *ifm,
if (err < 0)
goto out_unregister;
}
- if (tb[IFLA_MASTER]) {
- err = do_set_master(dev, nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_MASTER]), extack);
+ if (master) {
+ err = do_set_master(dev, master, extack);
if (err)
goto out_unregister;
}
@@ -3567,6 +3596,7 @@ static int __rtnl_newlink_setlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct rtnl_newlink_tbs *tbs,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
struct net *target_net, struct net_device *dev,
+ struct net_device *new_master,
const struct rtnl_link_ops *ops,
struct nlattr **linkinfo, struct nlattr **data)
{
@@ -3632,7 +3662,7 @@ static int __rtnl_newlink_setlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY;
}
- err = do_setlink(target_net, skb, dev, ifm, extack, tb, status);
+ err = do_setlink(target_net, skb, dev, new_master, ifm, extack, tb, status);
out:
return err;
}
@@ -3647,7 +3677,7 @@ static int __rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
const struct rtnl_link_ops *ops;
char kind[MODULE_NAME_LEN];
- struct net_device *dev;
+ struct net_device *dev, *new_master = NULL;
struct ifinfomsg *ifm;
struct nlattr **data;
bool link_specified;
@@ -3709,8 +3739,12 @@ static int __rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
}
if (dev) {
+ new_master = rtnl_master_get(target_net ? : net, tb);
+ if (IS_ERR(new_master))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
err = __rtnl_newlink_setlink(skb, nlh, tbs, extack,
- target_net, dev,
+ target_net, dev, new_master,
ops, linkinfo, data);
return err;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-22 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-22 14:37 [PATCH NET-PREV 00/51] Kill rtnl_lock using fine-grained nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:37 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 01/51] net: Move some checks from __rtnl_newlink() to caller Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 02/51] net: Add nlaattr check to rtnl_link_get_net_capable() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 03/51] net: do_setlink() refactoring: move target_net acquiring to callers Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 04/51] net: Extract some code from __rtnl_newlink() to separate func Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 06/51] net: Use unregister_netdevice_many() for both error cases in rtnl_newlink_create() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 07/51] net: Introduce nd_lock and primitives to work with it Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 08/51] net: Initially attaching and detaching nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 09/51] net: Use register_netdevice() in loopback() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 10/51] net: Underline newlink and changelink dependencies Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 11/51] net: Make master and slaves (any dependent devices) share the same nd_lock in .setlink etc Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 12/51] net: Use __register_netdevice in trivial .newlink cases Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 13/51] infiniband_ipoib: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 14/51] vxcan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 15/51] iavf: Use __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 16/51] geneve: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 17/51] netkit: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 18/51] qmi_wwan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 19/51] bpqether: Provide determined context in __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 20/51] ppp: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 21/51] veth: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 22/51] vxlan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 23/51] hdlc_fr: Use __register_netdevice Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 24/51] lapbeth: Provide determined context in __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 25/51] wwan: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 26/51] 6lowpan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 27/51] vlan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 28/51] dsa: Use __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 29/51] ip6gre: Use __register_netdevice() in .changelink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 30/51] ip6_tunnel: Use __register_netdevice() in .newlink and .changelink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 31/51] ip6_vti: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 32/51] ip6_sit: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 33/51] net: Now check nobody calls register_netdevice() with nd_lock attached Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 34/51] dsa: Make all switch tree ports relate to same nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 35/51] cfg80211: Use fallback_nd_lock for registered devices Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 36/51] ieee802154: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 37/51] net: Introduce delayed event work Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 38/51] failover: Link master and slave under nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 39/51] netvsc: Make joined device to share master's nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 40/51] openvswitch: Make ports share nd_lock of master device Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 41/51] bridge: Make port to have the same nd_lock as bridge Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 42/51] bond: Make master and slave relate to the same nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 43/51] net: Now check nobody calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link() without nd_lock attached Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 44/51] net: Call dellink with nd_lock is held Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 45/51] t7xx: Use __unregister_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 46/51] 6lowpan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 47/51] netvsc: Call dev_change_net_namespace() under nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 48/51] default_device: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 49/51] ieee802154: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:44 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 50/51] cfg80211: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:44 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 51/51] net: Make all NETDEV_REGISTER events to be called " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-24 2:51 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 00/51] Kill rtnl_lock using fine-grained nd_lock Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 11:15 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174265431086.356712.17422975834795735079.stgit@pro.pro \
--to=tkhai@ya.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®