mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tkhai@ya.ru
Subject: [PATCH NET-PREV 32/51] ip6_sit: Use __register_netdevice() in .newlink and .changelink
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:41:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <174265451228.356712.2871503046095180191.stgit@pro.pro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <174265415457.356712.10472727127735290090.stgit@pro.pro>

The objective is to conform .newlink and .changelink and their
callers, which already assign nd_lock (and matches master nd_lock
if there is one).

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
---
 net/ipv6/sit.c |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/sit.c b/net/ipv6/sit.c
index 83b195f09561..1749defa4b70 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/sit.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/sit.c
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int ipip6_tunnel_create(struct net_device *dev)
 
 	dev->rtnl_link_ops = &sit_link_ops;
 
-	err = register_netdevice(dev);
+	err = __register_netdevice(dev);
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static int ipip6_tunnel_create(struct net_device *dev)
 }
 
 static struct ip_tunnel *ipip6_tunnel_locate(struct net *net,
+					     struct nd_lock *nd_lock,
 					     struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern *parms,
 					     int create)
 {
@@ -269,6 +270,7 @@ static struct ip_tunnel *ipip6_tunnel_locate(struct net *net,
 	nt = netdev_priv(dev);
 
 	nt->parms = *parms;
+	attach_nd_lock(dev, nd_lock);
 	if (ipip6_tunnel_create(dev) < 0)
 		goto failed_free;
 
@@ -278,6 +280,7 @@ static struct ip_tunnel *ipip6_tunnel_locate(struct net *net,
 	return nt;
 
 failed_free:
+	detach_nd_lock(dev);
 	free_netdev(dev);
 failed:
 	return NULL;
@@ -1200,11 +1203,14 @@ ipip6_tunnel_get6rd(struct net_device *dev, struct ip_tunnel_parm __user *data)
 	struct ip_tunnel *t = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern p;
 	struct ip_tunnel_6rd ip6rd;
+	struct nd_lock *nd_lock;
 
 	if (dev == dev_to_sit_net(dev)->fb_tunnel_dev) {
 		if (!ip_tunnel_parm_from_user(&p, data))
 			return -EFAULT;
-		t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(t->net, &p, 0);
+		lock_netdev(dev, &nd_lock);
+		t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(t->net, nd_lock, &p, 0);
+		unlock_netdev(nd_lock);
 	}
 	if (!t)
 		t = netdev_priv(dev);
@@ -1273,9 +1279,13 @@ static int
 ipip6_tunnel_get(struct net_device *dev, struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern *p)
 {
 	struct ip_tunnel *t = netdev_priv(dev);
+	struct nd_lock *nd_lock;
 
-	if (dev == dev_to_sit_net(dev)->fb_tunnel_dev)
-		t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(t->net, p, 0);
+	if (dev == dev_to_sit_net(dev)->fb_tunnel_dev) {
+		lock_netdev(dev, &nd_lock);
+		t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(t->net, nd_lock, p, 0);
+		unlock_netdev(nd_lock);
+	}
 	if (!t)
 		t = netdev_priv(dev);
 	memcpy(p, &t->parms, sizeof(*p));
@@ -1286,13 +1296,16 @@ static int
 ipip6_tunnel_add(struct net_device *dev, struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern *p)
 {
 	struct ip_tunnel *t = netdev_priv(dev);
+	struct nd_lock *nd_lock;
 	int err;
 
 	err = __ipip6_tunnel_ioctl_validate(t->net, p);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(t->net, p, 1);
+	lock_netdev(dev, &nd_lock);
+	t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(t->net, nd_lock, p, 1);
+	unlock_netdev(nd_lock);
 	if (!t)
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 	return 0;
@@ -1302,13 +1315,16 @@ static int
 ipip6_tunnel_change(struct net_device *dev, struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern *p)
 {
 	struct ip_tunnel *t = netdev_priv(dev);
+	struct nd_lock *nd_lock;
 	int err;
 
 	err = __ipip6_tunnel_ioctl_validate(t->net, p);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(t->net, p, 0);
+	lock_netdev(dev, &nd_lock);
+	t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(t->net, nd_lock, p, 0);
+	unlock_netdev(nd_lock);
 	if (dev == dev_to_sit_net(dev)->fb_tunnel_dev) {
 		if (!t)
 			return -ENOENT;
@@ -1333,12 +1349,15 @@ static int
 ipip6_tunnel_del(struct net_device *dev, struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern *p)
 {
 	struct ip_tunnel *t = netdev_priv(dev);
+	struct nd_lock *nd_lock;
 
 	if (!ns_capable(t->net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	if (dev == dev_to_sit_net(dev)->fb_tunnel_dev) {
-		t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(t->net, p, 0);
+		lock_netdev(dev, &nd_lock);
+		t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(t->net, nd_lock, p, 0);
+		unlock_netdev(nd_lock);
 		if (!t)
 			return -ENOENT;
 		if (t == netdev_priv(dev_to_sit_net(dev)->fb_tunnel_dev))
@@ -1349,6 +1368,12 @@ ipip6_tunnel_del(struct net_device *dev, struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern *p)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/* This is called with rtnl locked and dev nd_lock unlocked.
+ * Note, that currently we take nd_lock in every of below
+ * function: ipip6_tunnel_get, ipip6_tunnel_add, etc instead
+ * of taking it once here, since there is call_netdevice_notifiers()
+ * in one of them, which is not prepared to use nd_lock yet.
+ */
 static int
 ipip6_tunnel_ctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern *p,
 		 int cmd)
@@ -1553,6 +1578,7 @@ static int ipip6_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
 			 struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[],
 			 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
+	struct nd_lock *nd_lock = rcu_dereference_protected(dev->nd_lock, true);
 	struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
 	struct ip_tunnel *nt;
 	struct ip_tunnel_encap ipencap;
@@ -1571,7 +1597,7 @@ static int ipip6_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
 
 	ipip6_netlink_parms(data, &nt->parms, &nt->fwmark);
 
-	if (ipip6_tunnel_locate(net, &nt->parms, 0))
+	if (ipip6_tunnel_locate(net, nd_lock, &nt->parms, 0))
 		return -EEXIST;
 
 	err = ipip6_tunnel_create(dev);
@@ -1601,6 +1627,7 @@ static int ipip6_changelink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *tb[],
 			    struct nlattr *data[],
 			    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
+	struct nd_lock *nd_lock = rcu_dereference_protected(dev->nd_lock, true);
 	struct ip_tunnel *t = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct ip_tunnel_encap ipencap;
 	struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern p;
@@ -1627,7 +1654,7 @@ static int ipip6_changelink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *tb[],
 	    (!(dev->flags & IFF_POINTOPOINT) && p.iph.daddr))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(net, &p, 0);
+	t = ipip6_tunnel_locate(net, nd_lock, &p, 0);
 
 	if (t) {
 		if (t->dev != dev)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-22 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-22 14:37 [PATCH NET-PREV 00/51] Kill rtnl_lock using fine-grained nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:37 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 01/51] net: Move some checks from __rtnl_newlink() to caller Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 02/51] net: Add nlaattr check to rtnl_link_get_net_capable() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 03/51] net: do_setlink() refactoring: move target_net acquiring to callers Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 04/51] net: Extract some code from __rtnl_newlink() to separate func Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 05/51] net: Move dereference of tb[IFLA_MASTER] up Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 06/51] net: Use unregister_netdevice_many() for both error cases in rtnl_newlink_create() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 07/51] net: Introduce nd_lock and primitives to work with it Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:38 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 08/51] net: Initially attaching and detaching nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 09/51] net: Use register_netdevice() in loopback() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 10/51] net: Underline newlink and changelink dependencies Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 11/51] net: Make master and slaves (any dependent devices) share the same nd_lock in .setlink etc Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 12/51] net: Use __register_netdevice in trivial .newlink cases Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 13/51] infiniband_ipoib: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 14/51] vxcan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 15/51] iavf: Use __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:39 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 16/51] geneve: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 17/51] netkit: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 18/51] qmi_wwan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 19/51] bpqether: Provide determined context in __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 20/51] ppp: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 21/51] veth: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 22/51] vxlan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 23/51] hdlc_fr: Use __register_netdevice Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:40 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 24/51] lapbeth: Provide determined context in __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 25/51] wwan: Use __register_netdevice in .newlink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 26/51] 6lowpan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 27/51] vlan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 28/51] dsa: Use __register_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 29/51] ip6gre: Use __register_netdevice() in .changelink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 30/51] ip6_tunnel: Use __register_netdevice() in .newlink and .changelink Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 31/51] ip6_vti: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:41 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2025-03-22 14:41 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 33/51] net: Now check nobody calls register_netdevice() with nd_lock attached Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 34/51] dsa: Make all switch tree ports relate to same nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 35/51] cfg80211: Use fallback_nd_lock for registered devices Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 36/51] ieee802154: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 37/51] net: Introduce delayed event work Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 38/51] failover: Link master and slave under nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 39/51] netvsc: Make joined device to share master's nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 40/51] openvswitch: Make ports share nd_lock of master device Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:42 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 41/51] bridge: Make port to have the same nd_lock as bridge Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 42/51] bond: Make master and slave relate to the same nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 43/51] net: Now check nobody calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link() without nd_lock attached Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 44/51] net: Call dellink with nd_lock is held Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 45/51] t7xx: Use __unregister_netdevice() Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 46/51] 6lowpan: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 47/51] netvsc: Call dev_change_net_namespace() under nd_lock Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 48/51] default_device: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 49/51] ieee802154: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:44 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 50/51] cfg80211: " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-22 14:44 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 51/51] net: Make all NETDEV_REGISTER events to be called " Kirill Tkhai
2025-03-24  2:51 ` [PATCH NET-PREV 00/51] Kill rtnl_lock using fine-grained nd_lock Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 11:15 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=174265451228.356712.2871503046095180191.stgit@pro.pro \
    --to=tkhai@ya.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®