From: "tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/cpu] tools/x86/kcpuid: Use C99-style for loops
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:05:42 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174289354238.14745.1979312224227532751.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324142042.29010-10-darwi@linutronix.de>
The following commit has been merged into the x86/cpu branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 0a8f12ccd2e6edac89292af63c3a2050b4aac61b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/0a8f12ccd2e6edac89292af63c3a2050b4aac61b
Author: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>
AuthorDate: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:20:30 +01:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:53:45 +01:00
tools/x86/kcpuid: Use C99-style for loops
Since commit e8c07082a810 ("Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11") and the kernel
allows C99-style variable declarations inside of a for() loop.
Adjust the kcpuid code accordingly.
Note, this helps readability as some of the kcpuid functions have a huge
list of variable declarations on top.
Note, remove the empty lines before cpuid() invocations as it is clearer
to have their parameter initialization and the actual call in one block.
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250324142042.29010-10-darwi@linutronix.de
---
tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c | 52 +++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c b/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c
index 4fa768b..413e5da 100644
--- a/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c
+++ b/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c
@@ -172,13 +172,10 @@ static bool cpuid_store(struct cpuid_range *range, u32 f, int subleaf,
static void raw_dump_range(struct cpuid_range *range)
{
- u32 f;
- int i;
-
printf("%s Leafs :\n", range->is_ext ? "Extended" : "Basic");
printf("================\n");
- for (f = 0; (int)f < range->nr; f++) {
+ for (u32 f = 0; (int)f < range->nr; f++) {
struct cpuid_func *func = &range->funcs[f];
/* Skip leaf without valid items */
@@ -186,7 +183,7 @@ static void raw_dump_range(struct cpuid_range *range)
continue;
/* First item is the main leaf, followed by all subleafs */
- for (i = 0; i < func->nr; i++)
+ for (int i = 0; i < func->nr; i++)
leaf_print_raw(&func->leafs[i]);
}
}
@@ -194,15 +191,14 @@ static void raw_dump_range(struct cpuid_range *range)
#define MAX_SUBLEAF_NUM 64
struct cpuid_range *setup_cpuid_range(u32 input_eax)
{
- u32 max_func, idx_func, subleaf, max_subleaf;
- u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx, f = input_eax;
struct cpuid_range *range;
- bool allzero;
+ u32 max_func, idx_func;
+ u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
eax = input_eax;
ebx = ecx = edx = 0;
-
cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+
max_func = eax;
idx_func = (max_func & 0xffff) + 1;
@@ -222,20 +218,21 @@ struct cpuid_range *setup_cpuid_range(u32 input_eax)
range->nr = idx_func;
memset(range->funcs, 0, sizeof(struct cpuid_func) * idx_func);
- for (; f <= max_func; f++) {
- eax = f;
- subleaf = ecx = 0;
+ for (u32 f = input_eax; f <= max_func; f++) {
+ u32 max_subleaf = MAX_SUBLEAF_NUM;
+ bool allzero;
+ eax = f;
+ ecx = 0;
cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
- allzero = cpuid_store(range, f, subleaf, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
+
+ allzero = cpuid_store(range, f, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
if (allzero)
continue;
if (!has_subleafs(f))
continue;
- max_subleaf = MAX_SUBLEAF_NUM;
-
/*
* Some can provide the exact number of subleafs,
* others have to be tried (0xf)
@@ -253,13 +250,12 @@ struct cpuid_range *setup_cpuid_range(u32 input_eax)
if (f == 0x80000026)
max_subleaf = 5;
- for (subleaf = 1; subleaf < max_subleaf; subleaf++) {
+ for (u32 subleaf = 1; subleaf < max_subleaf; subleaf++) {
eax = f;
ecx = subleaf;
-
cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
- allzero = cpuid_store(range, f, subleaf,
- eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
+
+ allzero = cpuid_store(range, f, subleaf, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
if (allzero)
continue;
}
@@ -280,12 +276,10 @@ struct cpuid_range *setup_cpuid_range(u32 input_eax)
static void parse_line(char *line)
{
char *str;
- int i;
struct cpuid_range *range;
struct cpuid_func *func;
struct subleaf *leaf;
u32 index;
- u32 sub;
char buffer[512];
char *buf;
/*
@@ -312,7 +306,7 @@ static void parse_line(char *line)
strncpy(buffer, line, 511);
buffer[511] = 0;
str = buffer;
- for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+ for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
tokens[i] = strtok(str, ",");
if (!tokens[i])
goto err_exit;
@@ -378,7 +372,7 @@ static void parse_line(char *line)
bit_end = strtoul(end, NULL, 0);
bit_start = (start) ? strtoul(start, NULL, 0) : bit_end;
- for (sub = subleaf_start; sub <= subleaf_end; sub++) {
+ for (u32 sub = subleaf_start; sub <= subleaf_end; sub++) {
leaf = &func->leafs[sub];
reg = &leaf->info[reg_index];
bdesc = ®->descs[reg->nr++];
@@ -432,10 +426,10 @@ static void parse_text(void)
static void show_reg(const struct reg_desc *rdesc, u32 value)
{
const struct bits_desc *bdesc;
- int start, end, i;
+ int start, end;
u32 mask;
- for (i = 0; i < rdesc->nr; i++) {
+ for (int i = 0; i < rdesc->nr; i++) {
bdesc = &rdesc->descs[i];
start = bdesc->start;
@@ -487,17 +481,13 @@ static void show_leaf(struct subleaf *leaf)
static void show_func(struct cpuid_func *func)
{
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < func->nr; i++)
+ for (int i = 0; i < func->nr; i++)
show_leaf(&func->leafs[i]);
}
static void show_range(struct cpuid_range *range)
{
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < range->nr; i++)
+ for (int i = 0; i < range->nr; i++)
show_func(&range->funcs[i]);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 14:20 [PATCH v3 00/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.3 Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Fix error handling Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 8:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Exit the program on invalid parameters Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Simplify usage() handling Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Save CPUID output in an array Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Print correct CPUID output register names Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Remove unused local variable Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Remove unused global variable Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Set function return type to void Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] tools/x86/kcpuid: Set parse_line() " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Use C99-style for loops Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Use <cpuid.h> intrinsics Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Refactor CPUID range handling for future expansion Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 12/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Extend CPUID index mask macro Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Consolidate index validity checks Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Filter valid CPUID ranges Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 15/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Define Transmeta and Centaur index ranges Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.0 Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.1 Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 18/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.2 Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.3 Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 20/20] MAINTAINERS: Include kcpuid under X86 CPUID DATABASE Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-25 9:05 ` [tip: x86/cpu] MAINTAINERS: Include the entire kcpuid/ directory under the X86 CPUID DATABASE entry tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174289354238.14745.1979312224227532751.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®