mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Dan Bonachea <bonachead@comcast.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: pthread-safety bug in write(2) on Linux 2.6.x
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:20:36 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17471.30580.883851.856830@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604130827490.14565@g5.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds writes:
 > 

[...]

 > + * so it's ok to test it independently on the lock/unlock path
 > + * rather than explicitly remembering whether we locked it.
 > + */
 > +static inline loff_t file_pos_read_lock(struct file *file)
 >  {
 > +	if (file->f_mode & FMODE_LSEEK)
 > +		mutex_lock(&file->f_pos_lock);
 >  	return file->f_pos;
 >  }
 >  
 > -static inline void file_pos_write(struct file *file, loff_t pos)
 > +static inline void file_pos_write_unlock(struct file *file, loff_t pos)
 >  {
 >  	file->f_pos = pos;
 > +	if (file->f_mode & FMODE_LSEEK)
 > +		mutex_unlock(&file->f_pos_lock);
 >  }

Naming of two functions above is confusing: it looks like read/write
lock is taken. Maybe file_pos_lock_and_get() and
file_pos_set_and_unlock()?

Nikita.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-14 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-13  1:45 Dan Bonachea
2006-04-13  2:10 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-04-13  4:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-13  5:33   ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-13 15:01     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 15:28       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-14 10:20         ` Nikita Danilov [this message]
2006-04-13 21:50       ` Alan Cox
2006-04-13 22:06         ` Dan Bonachea
2006-04-13 23:03           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 23:11           ` Alan Cox
2006-04-13 23:19             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 22:40         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 23:05           ` Alan Cox
2006-04-13 23:06             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 23:11               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13  9:18   ` Dan Bonachea
2006-04-13  9:56     ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-13 10:28       ` Kyle Moffett
2006-04-13 14:14     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-19 22:45 ` Jens Moser
     [not found] <60Z8f-4QA-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <611Wl-u5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <616k2-6Xz-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-04-14  9:14     ` Kai Henningsen
2006-04-27  9:06 Samuel Thibault
2006-04-27 15:23 ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17471.30580.883851.856830@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
    --to=nikita@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bonachead@comcast.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®