* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-08 2:35 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-08 9:27 ` Brett A C Sheffield
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-09-08 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/7/2025 12:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-08 2:35 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-09-08 9:27 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2025-09-08 15:01 ` Jon Hunter
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2025-09-08 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 5.15.192-rc1-00099-gccdfe77d4229 #77 SMP Mon Sep 8 08:57:49 -00 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-08 2:35 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-08 9:27 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2025-09-08 15:01 ` Jon Hunter
2025-09-08 18:24 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-09-08 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
linux-tegra, stable
On Sun, 07 Sep 2025 21:57:42 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
105 tests: 105 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.192-rc1-gccdfe77d4229
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-08 15:01 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-09-08 18:24 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-09-09 10:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-08 22:52 ` Shuah Khan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-09-08 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Anders Roxell, Arnd Bergmann, Dan Carpenter, David S. Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Ben Copeland
On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 01:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
While building Linux stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 the arm64 allyesconfig
builds failed.
* arm64, build
- gcc-12-allyesconfig
Regression Analysis:
- New regression? yes
- Reproducibility? yes
Build regression: stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 arm64 allyesconfig
qede_main.c:199:35: error: initialization of void from incompatible
pointer
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
### build log
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c:199:35: error:
initialization of 'void (*)(void *, u16, u16)' {aka 'void (*)(void *,
short unsigned int, short unsigned int)'} from incompatible pointer
type 'void (*)(void *, void *, u8)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, void *,
unsigned char)'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
199 | .arfs_filter_op = qede_arfs_filter_op,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This was reported on the Linux next-20250428 tag,
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYs+7-Jut2PM1Z8fXOkBaBuGt0WwTUvU=4cu2O8iQdwUYw@mail.gmail.com/
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.192-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: ccdfe77d4229628515f4f822400fe6414b9861f8
* git describe: v5.15.190-99-gccdfe77d4229
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.190-99-gccdfe77d4229
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.190-34-g29918c0c5b35)
* arm64, build
- gcc-12-allyesconfig
Build log: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/api/testruns/29791503/log_file/
Build details: https://regressions.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/v5.15.190-99-gccdfe77d4229/log-parser-build-gcc/gcc-compiler-drivers_net_ethernet_qlogic_qede_qede_main_c-error-initialization-of-void-void-u-u-from-incompatible-pointer-type-void-void-void-u/
Build link: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/32O3I8jsbRRLOu0azhrfBwOPAjC/
Build config: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/32O3I8jsbRRLOu0azhrfBwOPAjC/config
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-08 18:24 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-09-09 10:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-09 14:18 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-09-09 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Anders Roxell, Arnd Bergmann, Dan Carpenter, David S. Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Ben Copeland
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:54:56PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 01:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> While building Linux stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 the arm64 allyesconfig
> builds failed.
>
> * arm64, build
> - gcc-12-allyesconfig
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? yes
> - Reproducibility? yes
>
> Build regression: stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 arm64 allyesconfig
> qede_main.c:199:35: error: initialization of void from incompatible
> pointer
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> ### build log
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c:199:35: error:
> initialization of 'void (*)(void *, u16, u16)' {aka 'void (*)(void *,
> short unsigned int, short unsigned int)'} from incompatible pointer
> type 'void (*)(void *, void *, u8)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, void *,
> unsigned char)'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> 199 | .arfs_filter_op = qede_arfs_filter_op,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> This was reported on the Linux next-20250428 tag,
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYs+7-Jut2PM1Z8fXOkBaBuGt0WwTUvU=4cu2O8iQdwUYw@mail.gmail.com/
Odd, I can't reproduce this here, and nothing has changed in this driver
at all for this -rc cycle. I see no one responded to the linux-next
issue either, so any hints?
Also, the definition seems wrong from what you built, here it is with
the -rc patch applied:
$ git grep arfs_filter_op
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_l2.c: op->arfs_filter_op(dev, cookie, fw_return_code);
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede.h:void qede_arfs_filter_op(void *dev, void *filter, u8 fw_rc);
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c:void qede_arfs_filter_op(void *dev, void *filter, u8 fw_rc)
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c: .arfs_filter_op = qede_arfs_filter_op,
include/linux/qed/qed_if.h: void (*arfs_filter_op)(void *dev, void *fltr, u8 fw_rc);
No u16 stuff at all here.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-09 10:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-09 14:18 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-09-09 14:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-09-09 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Anders Roxell, Arnd Bergmann, Dan Carpenter, David S. Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Ben Copeland
On Tue, 9 Sept 2025 at 15:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:54:56PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 01:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> > > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > While building Linux stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 the arm64 allyesconfig
> > builds failed.
> >
> > * arm64, build
> > - gcc-12-allyesconfig
> >
> > Regression Analysis:
> > - New regression? yes
> > - Reproducibility? yes
> >
> > Build regression: stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 arm64 allyesconfig
> > qede_main.c:199:35: error: initialization of void from incompatible
> > pointer
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> > ### build log
> > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c:199:35: error:
> > initialization of 'void (*)(void *, u16, u16)' {aka 'void (*)(void *,
> > short unsigned int, short unsigned int)'} from incompatible pointer
> > type 'void (*)(void *, void *, u8)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, void *,
> > unsigned char)'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > 199 | .arfs_filter_op = qede_arfs_filter_op,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > This was reported on the Linux next-20250428 tag,
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYs+7-Jut2PM1Z8fXOkBaBuGt0WwTUvU=4cu2O8iQdwUYw@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Odd, I can't reproduce this here, and nothing has changed in this driver
> at all for this -rc cycle. I see no one responded to the linux-next
> issue either, so any hints?
Please ignore this allyesconfig build failure for now on 5.15 and 5.10.
Seems like it is my local builder issue.
- Naresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-09 14:18 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-09-09 14:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-09-09 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Anders Roxell, Arnd Bergmann, Dan Carpenter, David S. Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Ben Copeland
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 07:48:18PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sept 2025 at 15:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:54:56PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 01:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> > > > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > While building Linux stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 the arm64 allyesconfig
> > > builds failed.
> > >
> > > * arm64, build
> > > - gcc-12-allyesconfig
> > >
> > > Regression Analysis:
> > > - New regression? yes
> > > - Reproducibility? yes
> > >
> > > Build regression: stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 arm64 allyesconfig
> > > qede_main.c:199:35: error: initialization of void from incompatible
> > > pointer
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > ### build log
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c:199:35: error:
> > > initialization of 'void (*)(void *, u16, u16)' {aka 'void (*)(void *,
> > > short unsigned int, short unsigned int)'} from incompatible pointer
> > > type 'void (*)(void *, void *, u8)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, void *,
> > > unsigned char)'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > > 199 | .arfs_filter_op = qede_arfs_filter_op,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > > This was reported on the Linux next-20250428 tag,
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYs+7-Jut2PM1Z8fXOkBaBuGt0WwTUvU=4cu2O8iQdwUYw@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> > Odd, I can't reproduce this here, and nothing has changed in this driver
> > at all for this -rc cycle. I see no one responded to the linux-next
> > issue either, so any hints?
>
> Please ignore this allyesconfig build failure for now on 5.15 and 5.10.
> Seems like it is my local builder issue.
Great, thanks for letting me know,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-08 18:24 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-09-08 22:52 ` Shuah Khan
2025-09-09 6:14 ` Ron Economos
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2025-09-08 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, Shuah Khan
On 9/7/25 13:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-08 22:52 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2025-09-09 6:14 ` Ron Economos
2025-09-09 14:10 ` Vijayendra Suman
2025-09-09 17:36 ` Hardik Garg
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-09-09 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/7/25 12:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-09 6:14 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-09-09 14:10 ` Vijayendra Suman
2025-09-17 8:03 ` Pavel Machek
2025-09-09 17:36 ` Hardik Garg
7 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Vijayendra Suman @ 2025-09-09 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 08/09/25 1:27 am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/
> patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
No issues were seen on x86_64 and aarch64 platforms with our testing.
Tested-by: Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@oracle.com>> >
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-09 14:10 ` Vijayendra Suman
@ 2025-09-17 8:03 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2025-09-17 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vijayendra Suman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds,
akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1206 bytes --]
On Tue 2025-09-09 19:40:49, Vijayendra Suman wrote:
>
>
> On 08/09/25 1:27 am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/
> > patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> No issues were seen on x86_64 and aarch64 platforms with our testing.
>
> Tested-by: Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@oracle.com>> >
A little bit too many ">"s there. I guess there's missing \n or two
there :-).
Best regards,
Pavel
--
In cooperation with DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich,
Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review
2025-09-07 19:57 [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-09 14:10 ` Vijayendra Suman
@ 2025-09-09 17:36 ` Hardik Garg
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2025-09-09 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh,
linux-kernel, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel,
rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, perf tool, and kselftest builds fine for v5.15.192-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread