From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, donald.hunter@gmail.com,
jiri@resnulli.us, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev,
milena.olech@intel.com, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com,
ivecera@redhat.com, michal.michalik@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mschmidt@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dpll: spec: add missing module-name and clock-id to pin-get reply
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 01:30:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176161501100.1653952.3250284969978682466.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251024185512.363376-1-poros@redhat.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 20:55:12 +0200 you wrote:
> The dpll.yaml spec incorrectly omitted module-name and clock-id from the
> pin-get operation reply specification, even though the kernel DPLL
> implementation has always included these attributes in pin-get responses
> since the initial implementation.
>
> This spec inconsistency caused issues with the C YNL code generator.
> The generated dpll_pin_get_rsp structure was missing these fields.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] dpll: spec: add missing module-name and clock-id to pin-get reply
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/520ad9e96937
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-28 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 18:55 Petr Oros
2025-10-27 9:04 ` Ivan Vecera
2025-10-28 1:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176161501100.1653952.3250284969978682466.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.michalik@intel.com \
--cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
--cc=mschmidt@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®