mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com
Subject: Re: adjust prefetch in free_one_pgd()
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2002 18:39:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18259.1028396351@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208031014190.3981-100000@home.transmeta.com>


torvalds@transmeta.com said:
>  My personal opinion is that if a prefetch has semantic meanings
> outside the "speed up subsequent accesses", it should not be exposed
> to the rest of the kernel (it might still be useful inside
> architecture-specific routines like optimized memcpy etc). 

Prefetch generally means 'bring it into the cache'. On architectures with
non-cache-coherent DMA, doing a prefetch on wild address which happens to be
a DMA buffer for which we've just said 'drop it from the cache' is generally
a bad thing.

Not that I'm necessarily disagreeing with you -- but can you confirm that 
you are including all architectures with non-cache-coherent DMA in the 
'broken hardware' category below, or point out what I'm missing?

> I'd rather speed up non-broken machines and let the broken hardware
> hopefully slowly die away.


--
dwmw2



  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-03 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-02  0:12 David Mosberger
2002-08-02 13:04 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-02 15:39   ` David Mosberger
2002-08-02 15:46     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-02 15:56       ` Dave Jones
2002-08-02 15:59         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-02 16:04           ` Dave Jones
2002-08-02 17:49       ` Alan Cox
2002-08-02 16:38         ` David Mosberger
2002-08-02 17:58           ` Alan Cox
2002-08-02 16:53             ` David Mosberger
2002-08-03 16:59       ` David Woodhouse
2002-08-03 17:22         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-03 17:39           ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2002-08-03 19:36             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-03 22:03               ` David Woodhouse
2002-08-03 22:40                 ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18259.1028396351@redhat.com \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®