Re: [PATCH][next] dm vdo: Fix spelling mistake "postive" -> "positive"

[Matthew Sakai <msakai@redhat.com>]

I had to look at this for quite a while to figure out what was going on.
We made the same spelling error twice in the same function and somehow 
only noticed the first one previously? Anyway,

Reviewed-by: Matthew Sakai <msakai@redhat.com>

On 9/3/26 11:23 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There is another spelling mistake in a vdo_log_error message that
> I somehow overlooked last time. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c
> index 1d8375cc3c3e..043549b1fc2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int __must_check parse_slab_size(const char *slab_str, block_count_t *sla
>   
>   	result = kstrtoull(slab_str, 10, &value);
>   	if (result) {
> -		vdo_log_error("optional parameter error: invalid slab size, must be a postive integer");
> +		vdo_log_error("optional parameter error: invalid slab size, must be a positive integer");
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>