mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@oss.sgi.com" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 16:29:05 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010107162905.B1804@metastasis.f00f.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A578F27.D2A9DF52@candelatech.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A578F27.D2A9DF52@candelatech.com>; from greearb@candelatech.com on Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:33:27PM -0700

On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:33:27PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:

    I'm hoping that I can get a few comments on this code.  It was
    added to (significantly) speed up things like 'ifconfig -a' when
    running with 4000 or so VLAN devices.  It should also help other
    instances with lots of (virtual) devices, like FrameRelay, ATM,
    and possibly virtual IP interfaces.  It probably won't help
    'normal' users much, and in it's final form, should probably be a
    selectable option in the config process.

Virtual IP interfaces in the form of ifname:<number> (e.g. eth:1) IMO
should be deprecated and removed completely in 2.5.x. It's an ugly
external wart that should be removed.

That said, if this was done -- how would things like routing daemons
and bind cope? Actually, when I think about it they can't cope with
situating like this now:

tapu:~# ip addr show lo
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 3904 qdisc noqueue
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
    inet 10.0.0.1/32 scope global lo



  --cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-01-07  3:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-08  8:12 [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) Ben Greear
2001-01-06 21:33 ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Ben Greear
2001-01-06 23:17   ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07  4:06     ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 13:42       ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission Alan Cox
2001-01-07 15:33         ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 16:46           ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 17:32             ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 19:02         ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:06           ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 18:53             ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 19:30             ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:30               ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 22:40             ` 5116
2001-01-08  2:19             ` David Ford
2001-01-09 20:25             ` Christopher E. Brown
2001-01-10  2:47               ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:21           ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:00             ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 19:10               ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:24                 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-08  0:21                   ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:37             ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:53               ` jamal
2001-01-07  5:36     ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) David S. Miller
2001-01-07  3:29   ` Chris Wedgwood [this message]
2001-01-07  6:15     ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 10:22     ` David Ford
2001-01-07 12:01       ` David S. Miller
2001-01-08  5:32         ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-08  6:12           ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-08  6:26             ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-08  6:57               ` David Ford
2001-01-08 13:08                 ` jamal
2001-01-09 13:28                   ` Blu3Viper
2001-01-08  6:13           ` Blu3Viper
2001-01-07 12:13       ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-07 12:19         ` David Ford
2001-01-07 16:56     ` jamal
2001-01-07 17:37       ` Gleb Natapov
2001-01-07 18:02         ` routable interfaces WAS( " jamal
2001-01-07 19:21           ` routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (DoesNOT " Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:29             ` jamal
2001-01-07 18:51               ` Gleb Natapov
2001-01-07 19:05                 ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:19               ` routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT " Sandy Harris
2001-01-07 20:42                 ` Ben Greear
2001-01-08  0:37                   ` jamal
2001-01-08  5:25                     ` routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOTmeet " Ben Greear
2001-01-08 13:05                       ` jamal
2001-01-07  3:29   ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet " Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  4:00     ` jamal
2001-01-07  4:06       ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  5:43       ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07 11:40         ` [little bit OT] ip _IS_ _NOT_ ifconfig and route ! (was Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)) Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-01-07 11:50         ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07 13:47         ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission Alan Cox
2001-01-07 16:12           ` jamal
2001-01-07 16:51             ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 15:56         ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) jamal
2001-01-07 16:30           ` Gleb Natapov
2001-01-07 16:36             ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:54           ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumissionpolicy!) Ben Greear
2001-01-07  6:24       ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07  5:29         ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  6:22     ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Ben Greear
2001-01-07  5:27       ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  8:11         ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) (Benchmarks) Ben Greear
2001-01-07  7:15           ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-08  7:00           ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) David S. Miller
2001-01-08 16:26             ` Ben Greear
2001-01-08 16:50               ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-09 16:27                 ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 13:50       ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission Alan Cox
2001-01-07 16:44         ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2001-01-07 19:09         ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07  5:40   ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010107162905.B1804@metastasis.f00f.org \
    --to=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome