mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@nbase.co.il>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@oss.sgi.com" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 19:37:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010107193757.F28257@nbase.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010107162905.B1804@metastasis.f00f.org> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0101071144530.18916-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0101071144530.18916-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>; from hadi@cyberus.ca on Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:56:26AM -0500

On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:56:26AM -0500, jamal wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> 
> > That said, if this was done -- how would things like routing daemons
> > and bind cope?
> 
> I dont know of any routing daemons that are taking advantage of the
> alias interfaces today. This being said, i think that the fact that a
> lot of protocols that need IP-ization are coming up eg VLANs; you should
> see a good use for this. Out of curiosity for the VLAN people, how do you
> work with something like Zebra?

Without any problems. Zebra sees different VLAN interfaces as different networks
and happily route between them.

> One could have the route daemon take charge of management of these
> devices, a master device like "eth0" and a attached device like "vlan0".
> They both share the same ifindex but different have labels.
> Basically, i dont think there would be a problem.
>

Theoretically it seems to be possible but it's much harder to do in Zebra than 
in kernel. And "eth0" shouldn't share ifindex with "vlan0" I don't think SNMP
will be happy about that.

--
			Gleb.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-07 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-08  8:12 [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) Ben Greear
2001-01-06 21:33 ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Ben Greear
2001-01-06 23:17   ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07  4:06     ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 13:42       ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission Alan Cox
2001-01-07 15:33         ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 16:46           ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 17:32             ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 19:02         ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:06           ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 18:53             ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 19:30             ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:30               ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 22:40             ` 5116
2001-01-08  2:19             ` David Ford
2001-01-09 20:25             ` Christopher E. Brown
2001-01-10  2:47               ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:21           ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:00             ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-07 19:10               ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:24                 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-01-08  0:21                   ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:37             ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:53               ` jamal
2001-01-07  5:36     ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) David S. Miller
2001-01-07  3:29   ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-07  6:15     ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 10:22     ` David Ford
2001-01-07 12:01       ` David S. Miller
2001-01-08  5:32         ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-08  6:12           ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-08  6:26             ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-08  6:57               ` David Ford
2001-01-08 13:08                 ` jamal
2001-01-09 13:28                   ` Blu3Viper
2001-01-08  6:13           ` Blu3Viper
2001-01-07 12:13       ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-07 12:19         ` David Ford
2001-01-07 16:56     ` jamal
2001-01-07 17:37       ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2001-01-07 18:02         ` routable interfaces WAS( " jamal
2001-01-07 19:21           ` routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (DoesNOT " Ben Greear
2001-01-07 18:29             ` jamal
2001-01-07 18:51               ` Gleb Natapov
2001-01-07 19:05                 ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:19               ` routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT " Sandy Harris
2001-01-07 20:42                 ` Ben Greear
2001-01-08  0:37                   ` jamal
2001-01-08  5:25                     ` routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOTmeet " Ben Greear
2001-01-08 13:05                       ` jamal
2001-01-07  3:29   ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet " Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  4:00     ` jamal
2001-01-07  4:06       ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  5:43       ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07 11:40         ` [little bit OT] ip _IS_ _NOT_ ifconfig and route ! (was Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)) Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-01-07 11:50         ` David S. Miller
2001-01-07 13:47         ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission Alan Cox
2001-01-07 16:12           ` jamal
2001-01-07 16:51             ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 15:56         ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) jamal
2001-01-07 16:30           ` Gleb Natapov
2001-01-07 16:36             ` jamal
2001-01-07 19:54           ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumissionpolicy!) Ben Greear
2001-01-07  6:24       ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07  5:29         ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  6:22     ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) Ben Greear
2001-01-07  5:27       ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-07  8:11         ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) (Benchmarks) Ben Greear
2001-01-07  7:15           ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-08  7:00           ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks) David S. Miller
2001-01-08 16:26             ` Ben Greear
2001-01-08 16:50               ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-09 16:27                 ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07 13:50       ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission Alan Cox
2001-01-07 16:44         ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2001-01-07 19:09         ` Ben Greear
2001-01-07  5:40   ` [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010107193757.F28257@nbase.co.il \
    --to=gleb@nbase.co.il \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome