* Broken gcc ?
@ 2001-05-02 9:07 Amarendra GODBOLE
2001-05-02 11:48 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-02 14:28 ` Bob McElrath
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Amarendra GODBOLE @ 2001-05-02 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello World !
If I recall correctly, RHL 7 shipped with a broken gcc. Has it been
fixed ? Basically, is it safe to switch to RHL 7 for development
purposes ? Presently I use RHL 6.2 with 2.2.14 kernel.
Apologies if this is not the proper list for this question, and yes,
thanks in advance.
Peace,
-amar-
--
http://www.obscure.org/~amunix/
I have made mistakes but I have never made the mistake of claiming
that I have never made one.
-- James Gordon Bennett
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken gcc ?
2001-05-02 9:07 Broken gcc ? Amarendra GODBOLE
@ 2001-05-02 11:48 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-03 7:06 ` Michael Stiller
2001-05-02 14:28 ` Bob McElrath
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-05-02 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amarendra GODBOLE; +Cc: linux-kernel
> If I recall correctly, RHL 7 shipped with a broken gcc. Has it been
> fixed ? Basically, is it safe to switch to RHL 7 for development
> purposes ? Presently I use RHL 6.2 with 2.2.14 kernel.
I do all my kernel development with gcc 2.96-69 and 2.96-81 (the errata
7.0 and the 7.1 gcc).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken gcc ?
2001-05-02 11:48 ` Alan Cox
@ 2001-05-03 7:06 ` Michael Stiller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Stiller @ 2001-05-03 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: Amarendra GODBOLE, linux-kernel
>
> I do all my kernel development with gcc 2.96-69 and 2.96-81 (the errata
> 7.0 and the 7.1 gcc).
2.96-81 will not compile sgi's xfs patches due to some cpp macros using ##.
Use kgcc supplied with rh7 for that.
Cheers,
-Michael
--
x(f,s,c)char *s;{return f&1 ? *s ? *s-c ? x(f,++s,c) :7[s]:0:f&2
? x(--f,"!/*,xq-ih9]c$=le&M t)r\nm@p31n%ag.8}Sdoy",c):f&4 ? *s ?
x(f,s+1,putchar(x(f-2,"^&%!*)",*s))) : 0 : 0;}main(){return x(4,
"]!x/mhicn$!iihle&!x/mhiM$agimr%p !r@p%he&!x/mhiM !r@p%he",65);}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Broken gcc ?
2001-05-02 9:07 Broken gcc ? Amarendra GODBOLE
2001-05-02 11:48 ` Alan Cox
@ 2001-05-02 14:28 ` Bob McElrath
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bob McElrath @ 2001-05-02 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amarendra GODBOLE; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 688 bytes --]
Amarendra GODBOLE [agodbole@mahindrabt.com] wrote:
> Hello World !
>
> If I recall correctly, RHL 7 shipped with a broken gcc. Has it been
> fixed ? Basically, is it safe to switch to RHL 7 for development
> purposes ? Presently I use RHL 6.2 with 2.2.14 kernel.
It "works"...sorta. It will compile the kernel. But in my development
using lots of STL and C++, I've become an expert at generating "Internal
compiler error" with it. YMMV.
> Apologies if this is not the proper list for this question, and yes,
> thanks in advance.
Not really...
Cheers,
-- Bob
Bob McElrath (rsmcelrath@students.wisc.edu)
Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-03 7:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-02 9:07 Broken gcc ? Amarendra GODBOLE
2001-05-02 11:48 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-03 7:06 ` Michael Stiller
2001-05-02 14:28 ` Bob McElrath
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®