mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wingel@hog.ctrl-c.liu.se (Christer Weinigel)
To: bcrl@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 11:42:24 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010519094224.AD5A236DDC@hog.ctrl-c.liu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105190138150.6079-100000@toomuch.toronto.redhat.com>

In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105190138150.6079-100000@toomuch.toronto.redhat.com> you write:
>3. Userspace partition code proposal
>
>	Given the above two bits, here's a brief explaination of a
>	proposal to move management of the partitioning scheme into
>	userspace, along with portions of raid startup, lvm, uuid and
>	mount by label code needed for mounting the root filesystem.
>
>	Consider that the device node currently known as /dev/hda5 can
>	also be viewed as /dev/hda at offset 512000 with a limit of 10GB.
>	With the extensions in fs/block_dev.c, you could replace /dev/hda5
>	with /dev/hda/offset=512000,limit=10240000000.  Now, by putting
>	the partition parsing code into a libpart and binding mount to a
>	libpart, the root filesystem mounting code can be run out of an
>	initrd image.  The use of mount gives us the ability to mount
>	filesystems by UUID, by label or other exotic schemes without
>	having to add any additional code to the kernel.

The only problem I can see with this is that it removes one useful thing,
the ability to give a user access to a whole partition.

    chown wingel /dev/hda5

won't work anymore since there is no such device node.  

  /Christer
-- 
"Just how much can I get away with and still go to heaven?"

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-05-19  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 161+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-19  6:23 Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19  6:57 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19  7:04   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  7:23     ` Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19  8:30       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 10:13         ` Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19 14:02         ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code Alan Cox
2001-05-19 16:48           ` Erik Mouw
2001-05-19 17:45             ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-05-19 19:38               ` Erik Mouw
2001-05-19 20:53                 ` Steven Walter
2001-05-19 18:51         ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  2:18           ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20  2:22           ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  2:34             ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20  2:36             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20  2:48             ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  3:26               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 10:23                 ` Russell King
2001-05-20 10:35                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 18:46                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 18:57                     ` Russell King
2001-05-20 19:10                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:42                         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 20:07                           ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 20:33                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 23:59                             ` Paul Fulghum
2001-05-21  0:36                               ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21  3:08                                 ` Paul Fulghum
2001-05-20 20:07                           ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 23:46                           ` Ingo Molnar
2001-05-21  0:32                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21  3:12                             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-21 19:32                               ` Kai Henningsen
2001-05-23  1:15                               ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-20  2:51             ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20 21:13               ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:20                 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 20:41                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 21:29                     ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 21:51                       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 21:56                         ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 22:10                           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-21 22:22                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-22 15:41                               ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22  2:28                             ` Paul Mackerras
2001-05-22 13:33                             ` Jan Harkes
2001-05-22 16:30                               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22  0:22                         ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-22  0:57                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22  1:13                             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22  1:18                               ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22  7:49                                 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:31                                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 15:31                                     ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:38                                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 15:42                                         ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20  2:31           ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 16:57           ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-20 19:02             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:11               ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:18                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20 19:24                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:34                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:27                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:33                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:38                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:57               ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-21 13:57               ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-19  9:11     ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andrew Morton
2001-05-19  9:20       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  7:58   ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19  8:10     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  8:16       ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19  8:32         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  9:42 ` Christer Weinigel [this message]
2001-05-19  9:51 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Christer Weinigel
2001-05-19 11:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-19 14:25   ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-21  8:14     ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2001-05-22  9:07       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-19 13:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-19 13:57 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup) Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 15:10   ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device " Abramo Bagnara
2001-05-19 15:18     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 16:01     ` Willem Konynenberg
2001-05-20 20:52       ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-20 20:53       ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-19 18:13   ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device " Linus Torvalds
2001-05-19 23:19     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 23:31       ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device " Jeff Garzik
2001-05-19 23:32         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-19 23:39         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 15:47           ` F_CTRLFD (was Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil.) Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20 16:20             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:01               ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20 19:30                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 17:16           ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-21 16:26             ` David Lang
2001-05-21 18:04               ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-21 20:14             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-22 15:24               ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 16:51                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-22 17:49                   ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 20:22                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23  4:19                   ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-23  4:50                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-23 13:50                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 13:50                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 15:58                       ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-24  0:23                       ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-24  7:47                         ` Marko Kreen
2001-05-24 14:39                           ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-24 15:20                             ` CHR/BLK needed? was: Re: Why side-effects on open Marko Kreen
2001-05-24 17:12                             ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-24 17:25                         ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Daniel Phillips
2001-05-24 20:59                           ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-24 21:26                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-25  1:03                               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-25 11:00                             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-26  3:07                               ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-26 22:36                                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-27 13:32                                   ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-27 20:40                                     ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-27 20:45                                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-27 21:50                                       ` Marko Kreen
2001-05-28  1:26                                       ` Horst von Brand
2001-05-29 10:54                                         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-29 13:54                                           ` Horst von Brand
2001-05-19 23:52   ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20  0:18     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20  0:32       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20  0:52         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-20  1:03         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-20 19:41           ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD Alan Cox
2001-05-21  9:45           ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Andrew Clausen
2001-05-21 17:22           ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 18:53           ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-24  9:20             ` Malcolm Beattie
2001-05-24 19:15               ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 18:41         ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 19:06           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22 19:16             ` Peter J. Braam
2001-05-22 20:10               ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 20:59                 ` Peter J. Braam
2001-05-23  9:23                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-24 21:07                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-24 22:00                   ` Hans Reiser
2001-05-25 10:56                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-01  3:24                       ` [reiserfs-list] " Hans Reiser
2001-05-23  9:13               ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-20 20:23   ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device " Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:38     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 18:31 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Linus Torvalds
2001-05-19 11:09 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-19 11:43 ` Andrew Morton
2001-05-19 12:00   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 15:56     ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-21 12:43 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-21 16:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-22 18:45 Andries.Brouwer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010519094224.AD5A236DDC@hog.ctrl-c.liu.se \
    --to=wingel@hog.ctrl-c.liu.se \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®