mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>, Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>,
	Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD  w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 12:53:50 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200105221853.f4MIroHt011398@webber.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B0717CE.57613D4A@mandrakesoft.com> "from Jeff Garzik at May 19, 2001 09:03:10 pm"

Jeff writes:
> Here's a dumb question, and I apologize if I am questioning computer
> science dogma...
> 
> Why are LVM and EVMS(competing LVM project) needed at all?
> 
> Surely the same can be accomplished with
> * md
> * snapshot blkdev (attached in previous e-mail)
> * giving partitions and blkdevs the ability to grow and shrink
> * giving filesystems the ability to grow and shrink
> 
> On-line optimization (defrag, etc) shouldn't be hard once you have the
> ability to move blocks and files around, which would come with the
> ability to grow and shrink blkdevs and fs's.

You're missing virtual->physical block mapping allowing you to move parts
of the device around, freedom from the need for contiguous disk space.

In the end, what you've described above is pretty much what LVM does (and
EVMS does better).  Having the various components inside a single layer
like EVMS gives you a lot move flexibility, IMHO.  You also don't have
the issue of wasted minor numbers for unused partitions, or too few minor
numbers in other cases.

For example, with MD RAID you still need devices of equal size to create
a RAID 1 mirror, or part of one device is wasted.  With EVMS you can (in
the future, or right now with AIX/HPUX LVM) do the RAID 1 mirroring on a
per-logical-extent basis and you get your physical extents from any device.
Because your virtual->physical mapping is already abstract, it also allows
you to add mirroring to any existing LVM device without interruption.

Cheers, Andreas

PS - I used to think shrinking a filesystem online was useful, but there
     are a huge amount of problems with this and very few real-life
     benefits, as long as you can at least do offline shrinking.  With
     proper LVM usage, the need to shrink a filesystem never really
     happens in practise, unlike the partition case where you always
     have to guess in advance how big a filesystem needs to be, and then
     add 10% for a safety margin.  With LVM you just create the minimal
     sized device you need now, and freely grow it in the future.
-- 
Andreas Dilger  \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
                 \  would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/               -- Dogbert

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-05-24  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 161+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-19  6:23 [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19  6:57 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19  7:04   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  7:23     ` Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19  8:30       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 10:13         ` Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19 14:02         ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code Alan Cox
2001-05-19 16:48           ` Erik Mouw
2001-05-19 17:45             ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-05-19 19:38               ` Erik Mouw
2001-05-19 20:53                 ` Steven Walter
2001-05-19 18:51         ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  2:18           ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20  2:22           ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  2:34             ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20  2:36             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20  2:48             ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  3:26               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 10:23                 ` Russell King
2001-05-20 10:35                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 18:46                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 18:57                     ` Russell King
2001-05-20 19:10                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:42                         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 20:07                           ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 20:33                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 23:59                             ` Paul Fulghum
2001-05-21  0:36                               ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21  3:08                                 ` Paul Fulghum
2001-05-20 20:07                           ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 23:46                           ` Ingo Molnar
2001-05-21  0:32                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21  3:12                             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-21 19:32                               ` Kai Henningsen
2001-05-23  1:15                               ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-20  2:51             ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20 21:13               ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:20                 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 20:41                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 21:29                     ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 21:51                       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 21:56                         ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 22:10                           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-21 22:22                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-22 15:41                               ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22  2:28                             ` Paul Mackerras
2001-05-22 13:33                             ` Jan Harkes
2001-05-22 16:30                               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22  0:22                         ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-22  0:57                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22  1:13                             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22  1:18                               ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22  7:49                                 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:31                                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 15:31                                     ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:38                                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 15:42                                         ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20  2:31           ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 16:57           ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-20 19:02             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:11               ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:18                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20 19:24                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:34                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:27                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:33                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:38                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:57               ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-21 13:57               ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-19  9:11     ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andrew Morton
2001-05-19  9:20       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  7:58   ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19  8:10     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  8:16       ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19  8:32         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  9:42 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Christer Weinigel
2001-05-19  9:51 ` Christer Weinigel
2001-05-19 11:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-19 14:25   ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-21  8:14     ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2001-05-22  9:07       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-19 13:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-19 13:57 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup) Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 15:10   ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device " Abramo Bagnara
2001-05-19 15:18     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 16:01     ` Willem Konynenberg
2001-05-20 20:52       ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-20 20:53       ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-19 18:13   ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device " Linus Torvalds
2001-05-19 23:19     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 23:31       ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device " Jeff Garzik
2001-05-19 23:32         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-19 23:39         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 15:47           ` F_CTRLFD (was Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil.) Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20 16:20             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:01               ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20 19:30                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 17:16           ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-21 16:26             ` David Lang
2001-05-21 18:04               ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-21 20:14             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-22 15:24               ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 16:51                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-22 17:49                   ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 20:22                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23  4:19                   ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-23  4:50                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-23 13:50                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 13:50                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 15:58                       ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-24  0:23                       ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-24  7:47                         ` Marko Kreen
2001-05-24 14:39                           ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-24 15:20                             ` CHR/BLK needed? was: Re: Why side-effects on open Marko Kreen
2001-05-24 17:12                             ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-24 17:25                         ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Daniel Phillips
2001-05-24 20:59                           ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-24 21:26                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-25  1:03                               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-25 11:00                             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-26  3:07                               ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-26 22:36                                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-27 13:32                                   ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-27 20:40                                     ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-27 20:45                                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-27 21:50                                       ` Marko Kreen
2001-05-28  1:26                                       ` Horst von Brand
2001-05-29 10:54                                         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-29 13:54                                           ` Horst von Brand
2001-05-19 23:52   ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20  0:18     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20  0:32       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20  0:52         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-20  1:03         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-20 19:41           ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD Alan Cox
2001-05-21  9:45           ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Andrew Clausen
2001-05-21 17:22           ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 18:53           ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2001-05-24  9:20             ` Malcolm Beattie
2001-05-24 19:15               ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 18:41         ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 19:06           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22 19:16             ` Peter J. Braam
2001-05-22 20:10               ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 20:59                 ` Peter J. Braam
2001-05-23  9:23                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-24 21:07                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-24 22:00                   ` Hans Reiser
2001-05-25 10:56                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-01  3:24                       ` [reiserfs-list] " Hans Reiser
2001-05-23  9:13               ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-20 20:23   ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device " Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:38     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 18:31 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Linus Torvalds
2001-05-19 14:19 Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup) Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-19 14:58 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 16:41 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-19 16:51 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 17:14   ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-19 23:24     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 11:18 ` Matthew Kirkwood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200105221853.f4MIroHt011398@webber.adilger.int \
    --to=adilger@turbolinux.com \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=froese@gmx.de \
    --cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®