From: Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Clausen <clausen@gnu.org>
Cc: <torvalds@transmeta.com>, <viro@math.psu.edu>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 03:58:39 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105190350080.13165-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B06194B.C487240C@gnu.org>
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> (1) these issues are independent. The partition parsing could
> be done in user space, today, by blkpg, if I read the code correctly
> ;-) (there's an ioctl for [un]registering partitions) Never
> tried it though ;-)
I tried to imply that through the use of the the word component. Yes,
they're independant, but the code is pretty meaningless without a
demonstration of how it's used. ;-)
> (2) what about bootstrapping? how do you find the root device?
> Do you do "root=/dev/hda/offset=63,limit=1235823"? Bit nasty.
root= becomes a parameter to mount, and initrd becomes mandatory. I'd be
all for including all of the bits needed to build the initrd boot code in
the tree, but it's completely in the air.
> (3) how does this work for LVM and RAID?
It's not done yet, but similar techniques would be applied. I envision
that a raid device would support operations such as
open("/dev/md0/slot=5,hot-add=/dev/sda")
> (4) <propaganda>libparted already has a fair bit of partition
> scanning code, etc. Should be trivial to hack it up... That said,
> it should be split up into .so modules... 200k is a bit heavy just
> for mounting partitions (most of the bulk is file system stuff).
> </propaganda>
Good. Less work to do.
> (5) what happens to /etc/fstab? User-space ([u]mount?) translates
> /dev/hda1 into /dev/hda/offset=63,limit=1235823, and back?
I'd just create a symlink to /dev/hda1 at mount time, although that really
isn't what the user wants to see: the label or uuid is more useful.
-ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-19 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 162+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-19 6:23 [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19 6:57 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19 7:04 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 7:23 ` Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19 8:30 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 10:13 ` Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19 14:02 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code Alan Cox
2001-05-19 16:48 ` Erik Mouw
2001-05-19 17:45 ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-05-19 19:38 ` Erik Mouw
2001-05-19 20:53 ` Steven Walter
2001-05-19 18:51 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20 2:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20 2:22 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20 2:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20 2:36 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 2:48 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20 3:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 10:23 ` Russell King
2001-05-20 10:35 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 18:57 ` Russell King
2001-05-20 19:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:42 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 20:07 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 20:33 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 23:59 ` Paul Fulghum
2001-05-21 0:36 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 3:08 ` Paul Fulghum
2001-05-20 20:07 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 23:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-05-21 0:32 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 3:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-21 19:32 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-05-23 1:15 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-20 2:51 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20 21:13 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 20:41 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 21:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 21:51 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 21:56 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 22:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-21 22:22 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-22 15:41 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 2:28 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-05-22 13:33 ` Jan Harkes
2001-05-22 16:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22 0:22 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-22 0:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 1:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22 1:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 7:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 15:31 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 15:42 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 2:31 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 16:57 ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-20 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:11 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20 19:24 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:33 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:57 ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-21 13:57 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-19 9:11 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andrew Morton
2001-05-19 9:20 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 7:58 ` Ben LaHaise [this message]
2001-05-19 8:10 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 8:16 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19 8:32 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 9:42 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Christer Weinigel
2001-05-19 9:51 ` Christer Weinigel
2001-05-19 11:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-19 14:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-21 8:14 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2001-05-22 9:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-19 13:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-19 13:57 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup) Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 15:10 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device " Abramo Bagnara
2001-05-19 15:18 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 16:01 ` Willem Konynenberg
2001-05-20 20:52 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-20 20:53 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-19 18:13 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device " Linus Torvalds
2001-05-19 23:19 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 23:31 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device " Jeff Garzik
2001-05-19 23:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-19 23:39 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 15:47 ` F_CTRLFD (was Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil.) Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20 16:20 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:01 ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20 19:30 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 17:16 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-21 16:26 ` David Lang
2001-05-21 18:04 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-21 20:14 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-22 15:24 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 16:51 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-22 17:49 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 20:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 4:19 ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-23 4:50 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-23 13:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 13:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 15:58 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-24 0:23 ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-24 7:47 ` Marko Kreen
2001-05-24 14:39 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-24 15:20 ` CHR/BLK needed? was: Re: Why side-effects on open Marko Kreen
2001-05-24 17:12 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-24 17:25 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Daniel Phillips
2001-05-24 20:59 ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-24 21:26 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-25 1:03 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-25 11:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-26 3:07 ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-26 22:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-27 13:32 ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-27 20:40 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-27 20:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-27 21:50 ` Marko Kreen
2001-05-28 1:26 ` Horst von Brand
2001-05-29 10:54 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-29 13:54 ` Horst von Brand
2001-05-19 23:52 ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20 0:18 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 0:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 0:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-20 1:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-20 19:41 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD Alan Cox
2001-05-21 9:45 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Andrew Clausen
2001-05-21 17:22 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 18:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-24 9:20 ` Malcolm Beattie
2001-05-24 19:15 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 18:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22 19:16 ` Peter J. Braam
2001-05-22 20:10 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 20:59 ` Peter J. Braam
2001-05-23 9:23 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-24 21:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-24 22:00 ` Hans Reiser
2001-05-25 10:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-01 3:24 ` [reiserfs-list] " Hans Reiser
2001-05-23 9:13 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-20 20:23 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device " Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:38 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 18:31 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Linus Torvalds
2001-05-19 11:30 [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-19 17:50 ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-05-19 18:43 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-19 18:05 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-19 18:07 ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-05-19 19:50 ` Brad Boyer
2001-05-19 19:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-19 19:17 Andries.Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0105190350080.13165-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=clausen@gnu.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®