Re: Minor net/core/sock.c security issue?

[kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru]

Hello!

> For the time being I've just killed that bogus min define

It is not bogus. Bogus one is in sock.h.

Hundred times I discovered that min/max are not defined in some place,
but was lazy to search for header where they are defined. :-)


> I mean, grep for "define [min|max]" in just the networking
> sources right now, yuck!

grep better for min/max. Everywhere min/max are assumed to be shortcut
for (a<b?a:b).

And if you find a place, which relied on that silly inline in sock.h,
I will wonder at first and die of shame the next minute. :-)

Alexey