mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Hard Lockup on 2.4.16 with Via ieee1394 (sbp2 mode)
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 21:11:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011228211113.A15125@one-eyed-alien.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200112290321.fBT3GCSs007627@svr3.applink.net> <3C2D3DBB.6ADE1CC5@zip.com.au>, <3C2D3DBB.6ADE1CC5@zip.com.au>; <20011228204041.A14736@one-eyed-alien.net> <3C2D4DA5.E688FF43@zip.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <3C2D4DA5.E688FF43@zip.com.au>; from akpm@zip.com.au on Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 08:59:17PM -0800

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1029 bytes --]

It should be using scsi_done()... it actually seems to use whatever was
given as a done function at the queuecommand point, which is, I think,
scsi_done().

Matt

On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 08:59:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > 
> > Hrm...
> > 
> > Does this apply to usb-storage also?  Under what conditions do you need to
> > hold the io_request_lock when calling the done function?
> > 
> 
> That's scsi_old_done().  I don't think scsi_done() cares whether
> io_request_lock is held or not.
> 
> And io_request_lock *must* be held by the caller of scsi_old_done() - it
> assumes this.   I think we'd have heard by now if usb was getting this
> wrong.  Looks like it's using scsi_done(), yes?
> 
> -

-- 
Matthew Dharm                              Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net 
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver

Sir, for the hundreth time, we do NOT carry 600-round boxes of belt-fed 
suction darts!
					-- Salesperson to Greg
User Friendly, 12/30/1997

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2001-12-29  5:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-29  3:13 Timothy Covell
2001-12-29  3:51 ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-29  4:40   ` Matthew Dharm
2001-12-29  4:59     ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-29  5:11       ` Matthew Dharm [this message]
2001-12-29  6:17   ` Timothy Covell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011228211113.A15125@one-eyed-alien.net \
    --to=mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome