From: Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@urpla.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ronald.Wahl@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Ronald Wahl)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Q] Looking for an emulation for CMOV* instructions.
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:59:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020111195946.38C35142E@shrek.lisa.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16Oocq-0005tX-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E16Oocq-0005tX-00@the-village.bc.nu>
On Friday, 11. January 2002 00:28, Alan Cox wrote:
> > is it possible to include an emulation for the CMOV* (and possible other
> > i686 instructions) for processors that dont have these (k6, pentium
> > etc.)? I think this should work like the fpu emulation. Even if its slow
>
> The kernel isnt there to fix up the fact authors can't read. Its also very
> hard to get emulations right. I grant that this wasn't helped by the fact
> the gcc x86 folks also couldnt read the pentium pro manual correctly.
But it shouldn't crash, if the wrong architecture is chosen. (Different
problem, I know) Perfect solution would be emulate them all, but at least
an simple error message (please eject CPU, and put in a XXX one) would be
sufficient, IMHO.
> If you have a static linked program install the right version. RPMv4
> even knows about cmov and i686 rpms.
Hans-Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-11 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-10 23:08 Ronald Wahl
2002-01-10 23:28 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-11 0:08 ` Ronald Wahl
2002-01-11 0:26 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-11 0:39 ` Ronald Wahl
2002-01-11 0:54 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-11 1:09 ` Martin Eriksson
2002-01-11 1:42 ` Timothy Covell
2002-01-11 2:16 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-11 18:24 ` Ronald Wahl
2002-01-11 22:18 ` Richard Henderson
2002-01-11 23:07 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-11 23:26 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-01-11 23:40 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-16 15:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-01-16 16:16 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-01-16 17:48 ` Ronald Wahl
2002-01-16 17:30 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-17 11:54 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-01-11 19:59 ` Hans-Peter Jansen [this message]
2002-01-11 20:05 ` Ronald Wahl
2002-01-11 23:19 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-12 6:27 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-12 20:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-12 6:34 ` Pavel Machek
2002-01-18 17:38 ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-18 22:01 ` Pavel Machek
2002-01-11 23:25 ` Alistair Riddell
[not found] <fa.eln67tv.a4io16@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.gp0gofv.1p4se16@ifi.uio.no>
2002-01-11 8:12 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-01-11 9:25 willy tarreau
2002-01-11 17:55 ` Ronald Wahl
[not found] <m26669olcu.fsf@goliath.csn.tu-chemnitz.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <E16Oocq-0005tX-00@the-village.bc.nu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-01-11 9:54 ` Andi Kleen
2002-01-12 6:31 ` Pavel Machek
2002-01-12 7:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] <200201111845.g0BIjS2318104@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
2002-01-12 9:00 ` willy tarreau
2002-01-12 18:57 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-12 10:48 Adam J. Richter
2002-01-12 11:25 ` David Weinehall
2002-01-12 13:18 ` Brian Gerst
2002-01-12 20:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020111195946.38C35142E@shrek.lisa.de \
--to=hpj@urpla.net \
--cc=Ronald.Wahl@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®