Re: [Q] Looking for an emulation for CMOV* instructions.

[Ronald Wahl <Ronald.Wahl@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>]

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:16:55 -0500 (EST), Richard B Johnson wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>> Alan Cox wrote:
>> > > What's the point of optimizing an IF to a cmov if I have
>> > > to insert another IF to see if I can use cmov?
>> > 
>> > I've always wondered. Intel made the instruction optional yet there isnt
>> > an obvious way to do runtime fixups on it
>> 
>> Yes there is -- emulation! :-)
>> 

> It's just as bad, probably worse! You trap on an invalid op-code. The
> trap-handler checks the op-code and if it's emulated, it emulates it
> and returns to the executing task. This takes many instruction cycles,
> certainly more than `if(cmov) doit; else do_something_else;` --which,
> itself, takes many more instruction cycles than cmov is supposed to
> reduce. It's a no-win situation. The only way to win is a compile-time
> choice. This means customizing for your CPU IFF it has the cmov
> instruction.

It is a big win in the situation where you have only a binary for i686
and want or better must execute it e.g. on a i586. This was the reason
why I asked initially.

ron

-- 
/\/\  Dipl.-Inf. Ronald Wahl                /\/\        C S N         /\/\
\/\/  ronald.wahl@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \/\/  ------------------  \/\/
/\/\  http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~row/       /\/\  network and system  /\/\
\/\/  GnuPG/PGP key available               \/\/    administration    \/\/