From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@work.bitmover.com>,
David Lang <dlang@diginsite.com>, Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bk patch] Make cardbus compile in -pre4
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 16:45:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020209234555.GG872@opus.bloom.county> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020209090527.B13735@work.bitmover.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202091258110.25220-100000@dlang.diginsite.com> <20020209134132.J13735@work.bitmover.com> <20020209163603.B9826@lynx.turbolabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020209163603.B9826@lynx.turbolabs.com>
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 04:36:03PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> One thing that I've noticed (got my first linux-2.5 clone last night) is
> that the kernel build process is somewhat broken by the fact that not
> everything that you need to build is checked out of the repository by
> make.
>
> It appears to handle .c files ok, but it failed for all of the .h files.
> I take it this means that gcc doesn't know anything about SCCS, and it
> would also appear that make is not properly checking dependencies for
> these files, or it would have checked them out, right?
It's a 'feature' of the dependancy setup of the kernel. bk -r get -q
will checkout all of the files everywhere, and the build _should_ work
(there's been times autogenerated files were in the kernel and thus
broke building from a bk repo).
> Also, things like "make menuconfig" and such also fail (because they are
> doing stuff within scripts that have no concept of SCCS or BK). Will
> the new kernel build system take any of this into account?
I don't think they do now, but it wouldn't be too hard I'd think. If of
course the files needed to build/run the tools get checked out :)
> I would prefer if we only checked out as much as we need (instead of
> doing something like 'bk -r edit' which will use up a lot of space in
> each clone for architectures and drivers which I don't need).
Don't -r edit, -r get. You can go and selectively clean out some dirs,
but in short, no.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-09 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-09 2:25 Patrick Mochel
2002-02-09 3:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-09 4:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-09 7:29 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-09 7:41 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-10 2:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-10 3:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-10 7:47 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-10 20:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-11 18:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-09 5:12 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-09 5:32 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-09 9:36 ` Rob Landley
2002-02-09 9:57 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-09 10:01 ` Alexander Viro
2002-02-09 18:09 ` Rob Landley
2002-02-09 15:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-10 4:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-09 10:14 ` David Lang
2002-02-09 15:54 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-09 16:50 ` Tom Rini
2002-02-09 17:05 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-09 21:01 ` David Lang
2002-02-09 21:41 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-09 23:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-09 23:45 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2002-02-10 0:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-09 23:52 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-10 4:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-10 18:02 ` Tom Rini
2002-02-10 5:25 ` William Stearns
2002-02-11 17:30 ` Padraig Brady
2002-02-13 11:59 ` Padraig Brady
2002-02-09 9:27 ` pull vs push (was Re: [bk patch] Make cardbus compile in -pre4) Rob Landley
2002-02-09 10:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-09 18:12 ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-09 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-09 20:12 ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-09 20:26 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-09 20:51 ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-09 23:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-09 23:49 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-09 20:57 ` Pau Aliagas
2002-02-09 21:07 ` David Lang
2002-02-09 21:13 ` Pau Aliagas
2002-02-09 21:45 ` Rob Landley
2002-02-10 0:19 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-10 0:36 ` Herbert Xu
2002-02-10 0:54 ` ssh primer (was Re: pull vs push (was Re: [bk patch] Make cardbus compile in -pre4)) Jeff Garzik
2002-02-10 0:59 ` Herbert Xu
2002-02-10 1:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-10 8:13 ` Herbert Xu
2002-02-13 17:13 ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-02-14 0:22 ` Rob Landley
2002-02-14 6:57 ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-02-14 11:00 ` Harald Arnesen
2002-02-10 0:59 ` Ben Pfaff
2002-02-10 1:14 ` David Lang
2002-02-10 1:22 ` ssh primer (was Re: pull vs push (was Re: [bk patch] Make cardbuscompile " Jeff Garzik
2002-02-10 2:46 ` pull vs push (was Re: [bk patch] Make cardbus compile in -pre4) Alan Cox
2002-02-11 11:51 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-11 18:42 ` John Alvord
2002-02-09 11:44 ` [bk patch] Make cardbus compile in -pre4 Peter Osterlund
2002-02-10 20:12 Chris Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020209234555.GG872@opus.bloom.county \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dlang@diginsite.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=lm@work.bitmover.com \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®