Re: OOPS: ext3/sparc badness

[Andrew Beresford <beezly@beezly.org.uk>]

David,

On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 03:06:28PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
>    Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 22:52:06 +0100
> 
>    On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 02:30:18PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>    > Unsupported compiler for sparc64 kernels.  Your OOPS report is going
>    > to be ignored.

Understood, but the reason I was using 3.0.4 was because sparc64-egcs
has been suspected of generating some bad code in the md.c (see the link
in the previous e-mail I sent).

>    Btw, is gcc 3.1 supported now or only the magic egcs variant?
>    
> gcc-3.1 should work properly, I've used it but I'm hesitant to %100
> bless it just yet. :-)
> 
> I would prefer to receive bug reports only against the sparc64-egcs
> compiler still.

I will give gcc-3.1 a try.

Cheers,

Beezly