mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4)
@ 2002-08-29 11:14 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
  2002-08-29 11:18 ` 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? David S. Miller
  2002-08-30  5:34 ` 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4) Mike Galbraith
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk @ 2002-08-29 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kernel mailing list

hi all

David S. Miller tells me here that '2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 
2.4.19 anyways'

is this correct?

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: e1000/2.4
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: roy@karlsbakk.net

If you get "a patch" it almost certainly won't build because the e1000
driver in 2.4.20-preX depends upon the NAPI stuff we added to the
2.4.x tree

2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways :-)

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/
Tel: +47 9801 3356

Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19???
  2002-08-29 11:14 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4) Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
@ 2002-08-29 11:18 ` David S. Miller
  2002-08-30  5:34 ` 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4) Mike Galbraith
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2002-08-29 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: roy; +Cc: linux-kernel

   From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
   Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:14:11 +0200

   David S. Miller tells me here that '2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 
   2.4.19 anyways'
   
   is this correct?

If you're using the bonding driver, for one this.
It OOPS's in 2.4.19

There are other critical fixes in 2.4.20-preX as well.

Why is this news?  Stop the presses!  2.4.20-preX has more fixes than
2.4.19, how astonishing!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4)
  2002-08-29 11:14 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4) Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
  2002-08-29 11:18 ` 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? David S. Miller
@ 2002-08-30  5:34 ` Mike Galbraith
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Galbraith @ 2002-08-30  5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Kernel mailing list

At 01:14 PM 8/29/2002 +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>hi all
>
>David S. Miller tells me here that '2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than
>2.4.19 anyways'
>
>is this correct?

(flips coin)

No.

(Now, who are you going to believe.. grep is your friend;)

         -Mike


>----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
>
>Subject: e1000/2.4
>Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
>From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
>To: roy@karlsbakk.net
>
>If you get "a patch" it almost certainly won't build because the e1000
>driver in 2.4.20-preX depends upon the NAPI stuff we added to the
>2.4.x tree
>
>2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways :-)
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>
>--
>Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
>ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/
>Tel: +47 9801 3356
>
>Computers are like air conditioners.
>They stop working when you open Windows.
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-30  5:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-29 11:14 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4) Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-08-29 11:18 ` 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? David S. Miller
2002-08-30  5:34 ` 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4) Mike Galbraith

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®