* KIRQ Balance
@ 2003-01-06 19:40 Kamble, Nitin A
2003-01-11 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kamble, Nitin A @ 2003-01-06 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin J. Bligh, William Lee Irwin III
Cc: Protasevich, Natalie, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, Christoph Hellwig,
James Cleverdon, Linux Kernel, John Stultz, Nakajima, Jun,
Mallick, Asit K, Saxena, Sunil, Van Maren, Kevin, Andi Kleen,
Hubert Mantel, Schlobohm, Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin J. Bligh [mailto:mbligh@aracnet.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 11:52 PM
Subject: RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with
m ore than 8 CPUs
If you're interested in working on it, I'm very happy to test it ...
(should probably be kept seperate from your other stuff though).
I'll see if I can find someone in our performance team to evaluate
how your existing patch runs on SMP for us ...
M.
Hi Martin,
Would somebody get a chance to try the kirq patch out? If yes, please
let me know, how the patch did on your systems. Did your guys find any
issues with it? I will also appreciate more comments.
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: KIRQ Balance
2003-01-06 19:40 KIRQ Balance Kamble, Nitin A
@ 2003-01-11 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2003-01-11 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamble, Nitin A; +Cc: Linux Kernel
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> Would somebody get a chance to try the kirq patch out? If yes, please
> let me know, how the patch did on your systems. Did your guys find any
> issues with it? I will also appreciate more comments.
Where/What is the kirq patch?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: KIRQ Balance
@ 2003-01-11 16:54 Nakajima, Jun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nakajima, Jun @ 2003-01-11 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig, Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Linux Kernel, Saxena, Sunil, Mallick, Asit K
This is the one we posted (by Nitin) recently. It's a complementary solution to Ingo's random/round-robin interrupt routing, co-existing with it. See Nitin's emails for the patch and details.
Jun
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@infradead.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 2:32 AM
> To: Kamble, Nitin A
> Cc: Linux Kernel
> Subject: Re: KIRQ Balance
>
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> > Would somebody get a chance to try the kirq patch out? If yes, please
> > let me know, how the patch did on your systems. Did your guys find any
> > issues with it? I will also appreciate more comments.
>
> Where/What is the kirq patch?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-11 16:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-06 19:40 KIRQ Balance Kamble, Nitin A
2003-01-11 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-01-11 16:54 Nakajima, Jun
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®