* nmi_int.c: do not use __u8 when there's no need
@ 2003-02-10 16:38 Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2003-02-10 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty trivial patch monkey Russell, kernel list, torvalds
Hi!
Those "__"'s have no right to live, please apply,
Pavel
--- clean/arch/i386/oprofile/nmi_int.c 2003-01-05 22:58:19.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-swsusp/arch/i386/oprofile/nmi_int.c 2003-02-10 17:09:55.000000000 +0100
@@ -217,9 +248,9 @@
int __init nmi_init(struct oprofile_operations ** ops, enum oprofile_cpu * cpu)
{
- __u8 vendor = current_cpu_data.x86_vendor;
- __u8 family = current_cpu_data.x86;
- __u8 cpu_model = current_cpu_data.x86_model;
+ u8 vendor = current_cpu_data.x86_vendor;
+ u8 family = current_cpu_data.x86;
+ u8 cpu_model = current_cpu_data.x86_model;
if (!cpu_has_apic)
return 0;
--
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-02-11 11:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-10 16:38 nmi_int.c: do not use __u8 when there's no need Pavel Machek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®