BK->CVS notify?

BK->CVS notify?

[Larry McVoy]

Hi,  I was moving machines around and for the last day and a half or so the
CVS trees weren't getting updated.  They should be up to date as of now.

Do we need a cvs-updates mailing list which gets notified of updates or
do you not care?  I'd be interested in knowing how many people are using
the CVS trees.

One other comment: there was concern that the incremental update would 
not be as good as a one pass conversion.  So far, the one pass and the
incremental results are identical, no exceptions.  So 
-- 
---
Larry McVoy              lm at bitmover.com          http://www.bitmover.com/lm

Re: BK->CVS notify?

[Matti Aarnio]

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:21:21AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> Hi,  I was moving machines around and for the last day and a half or so the
> CVS trees weren't getting updated.  They should be up to date as of now.
> 
> Do we need a cvs-updates mailing list which gets notified of updates or
> do you not care?  I'd be interested in knowing how many people are using
> the CVS trees.

If we need(*),  VGER is already running  bk-commit-head  and bk-commit-24
lists.  Adding  bk-cvs-head-nofify  / bk-cvs-24-notify  makes hardly
detectable addition to load.

(*) I don't have opinnion, I just note about existing lists.
    See:  http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html

> One other comment: there was concern that the incremental update would 
> not be as good as a one pass conversion.  So far, the one pass and the
> incremental results are identical, no exceptions.  So 
> -- 
> ---
> Larry McVoy            lm at bitmover.com          http://www.bitmover.com/lm

/Matti Aarnio