From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org,
linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.73] Signal stack fixes #1 introduce PF_SS_ACTIVE
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 12:44:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030705104428.GA19311@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030705073031.GB32363@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
On Sat, 5 July 2003 09:30:31 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Fri, 4 July 2003 17:39:01 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > So how about something like the appended? Very simple patch,i and in fact
> > it's more logical than the old behaviour (the old behaviour punched
> > through blocked signals, the new ones says "if you block or ignore the
> > signal we will just kill you through the default action").
>
> That seems to be the best solution. Thanks!
Except that the patch didn't match the description. My test loops
just as happily as before and the conditional part of give_sigsegv is
pointless now. That might really break some threading stuff.
Anyway, the idea still makes sense, so I will try to come up with a
working patch.
Jörn
--
"Translations are and will always be problematic. They inflict violence
upon two languages." (translation from German)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-05 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-03 20:24 [PATCH 2.5.73] Fix broken signal optimization for i386 Jörn Engel
2003-07-04 17:43 ` Jörn Engel
2003-07-04 17:45 ` [PATCH 2.5.73] Signal stack fixes #1 introduce PF_SS_ACTIVE Jörn Engel
2003-07-04 17:51 ` [PATCH 2.5.73] Signal stack fixes #2 i386-specific Jörn Engel
2003-07-04 17:54 ` [PATCH 2.5.73] Signal stack fixes #1 introduce PF_SS_ACTIVE Jörn Engel
2003-07-04 17:58 ` [PATCH 2.5.73] Signal handling fix for ppc Jörn Engel
2003-07-04 23:26 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-07-05 7:33 ` Jörn Engel
2003-07-04 23:18 ` [PATCH 2.5.73] Signal stack fixes #1 introduce PF_SS_ACTIVE Paul Mackerras
2003-07-05 7:39 ` Jörn Engel
2003-07-06 8:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-07-06 10:17 ` Jörn Engel
2003-07-07 11:29 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-07-07 11:58 ` Jörn Engel
2003-07-07 11:33 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-07-07 11:46 ` Jörn Engel
2003-07-04 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-07-04 19:38 ` Jörn Engel
2003-07-04 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-07-04 20:18 ` Jörn Engel
2003-07-05 0:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-07-05 7:30 ` Jörn Engel
2003-07-05 10:44 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2003-07-05 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-07-06 12:51 ` Jörn Engel
2003-07-07 9:30 ` [PATCH 2.5.74] Signal stack safety #2 i386 specific Jörn Engel
2003-07-05 17:06 ` [PATCH 2.5.73] Signal stack fixes #1 introduce PF_SS_ACTIVE Jamie Lokier
2003-07-06 1:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-07-04 19:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-04 20:24 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030705104428.GA19311@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--to=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®