* Re: [PATCH] helper for device list traversal
[not found] <200309270508.h8R58tHE015032@hera.kernel.org>
@ 2003-09-27 11:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-27 11:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-09-27 12:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2003-09-27 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Linux Kernel Development
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> ChangeSet 1.1217.10.16, 2003/09/25 12:10:17-05:00, hch@lst.de
>
> [PATCH] helper for device list traversal
>
> This patch adds shost_for_each_device(). It's used to abstract out
> scsi_host.my_devices traversal. The next step will be to replace
> the current simple implementation with one that's fully locked down
> an reference counted.
Is this what we should use to fix the currently broken list traversal[*] in
drivers/scsi/{a2091,gvp11,53c7xx}.c?
Currently ut uses
struct Scsi_Host *instance;
for (instance = first_instance; instance &&
instance->hostt == xxx_template; instance = instance->next)
bust Scsi_Host.next was removed a while ago...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] helper for device list traversal
2003-09-27 11:34 ` [PATCH] helper for device list traversal Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2003-09-27 11:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-09-27 12:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-27 12:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2003-09-27 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Linux Kernel Development
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Is this what we should use to fix the currently broken list traversal[*] in
> drivers/scsi/{a2091,gvp11,53c7xx}.c?
where does that [*] refere to?
> Currently ut uses
>
> struct Scsi_Host *instance;
> for (instance = first_instance; instance &&
> instance->hostt == xxx_template; instance = instance->next)
>
> bust Scsi_Host.next was removed a while ago...
Most users of that construct want to use scsi_lookup_host (if they
looked for a specific host struct).
Above patch is for scsi_device list traversal, not Scsi_Host.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] helper for device list traversal
2003-09-27 11:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2003-09-27 12:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-27 12:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2003-09-27 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Linux Kernel Development
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Is this what we should use to fix the currently broken list traversal[*] in
> > drivers/scsi/{a2091,gvp11,53c7xx}.c?
>
> where does that [*] refere to?
To the part below. Sorry, I changed the structure of the mail but forgot to
remove the [*].
> > Currently ut uses
> >
> > struct Scsi_Host *instance;
> > for (instance = first_instance; instance &&
> > instance->hostt == xxx_template; instance = instance->next)
> >
> > bust Scsi_Host.next was removed a while ago...
>
> Most users of that construct want to use scsi_lookup_host (if they
> looked for a specific host struct).
The A2091 and GVP-II drivers want to traverse the list of SCSI host adapters in
their interrupt handler, to find their Scsi_Host instances and check whether
the (shared) interrupt was meant for one of them.
An alternative would be to register the interrupt handler multiple times and
use the Scsi_Host instance pointer as the interrupt handler data pointer.
For 53c7xx it's a bit more complex, I don't know anything about its internals.
In all 3 cases, I don't have the hardware...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] helper for device list traversal
2003-09-27 11:34 ` [PATCH] helper for device list traversal Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-27 11:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2003-09-27 12:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2003-09-27 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Linux Kernel Development
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > ChangeSet 1.1217.10.16, 2003/09/25 12:10:17-05:00, hch@lst.de
> >
> > [PATCH] helper for device list traversal
> >
> > This patch adds shost_for_each_device(). It's used to abstract out
> > scsi_host.my_devices traversal. The next step will be to replace
> > the current simple implementation with one that's fully locked down
> > an reference counted.
>
> Is this what we should use to fix the currently broken list traversal[*] in
> drivers/scsi/{a2091,gvp11,53c7xx}.c?
>
> Currently ut uses
>
> struct Scsi_Host *instance;
> for (instance = first_instance; instance &&
> instance->hostt == xxx_template; instance = instance->next)
>
> bust Scsi_Host.next was removed a while ago...
Urgg. This is totally hosed. The drivers should be fixed up to
pass the right host to request_irq and the only handle the right
one in the isr instead of walking a lits of all hosts of that template..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] helper for device list traversal
2003-09-27 12:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2003-09-27 12:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2003-09-27 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Linux Kernel Development
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:15:56PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The A2091 and GVP-II drivers want to traverse the list of SCSI host adapters in
> their interrupt handler, to find their Scsi_Host instances and check whether
> the (shared) interrupt was meant for one of them.
>
> An alternative would be to register the interrupt handler multiple times and
> use the Scsi_Host instance pointer as the interrupt handler data pointer.
Yes, they should do that.
> For 53c7xx it's a bit more complex, I don't know anything about its internals.
The occurance in #if 0 code should probably use scsi_lookup_host.
process_issue_queue needs to be rewritten to be per-host.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-27 12:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200309270508.h8R58tHE015032@hera.kernel.org>
2003-09-27 11:34 ` [PATCH] helper for device list traversal Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-27 11:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-09-27 12:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-27 12:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-09-27 12:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®