From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
To: Daniel Tram Lux <daniel@starbattle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ide.c as a module
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:30:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200312121430.36735.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031212092006.GA13250@starbattle.com>
On Friday 12 of December 2003 10:20, Daniel Tram Lux wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 10:25:14PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 of December 2003 21:25, Daniel Tram Lux wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I needed the ide-subsytem as a module on 2.4.23 and noticed (due to the
> > > missing modprobe on the embedded linux system) that ide.c tries to load
> > > the module ide-probe-mod which is called ide-detect now. The patch also
> > > get's rid of the need for ide-probe-mini alias ide-detect, but I don't
> > > know if that is desired? (it was in my case).
> >
> > It is incorrect, it will make most of modules for PCI IDE chipsets fail
> > due to always calling ide_init() from ide.c:init_module().
>
> ide_init is called from ide.c:init_module()
> in the original version:
>
> int init_module (void)
> {
> parse_options(options);
> return ide_init(); <--------
> }
I was thinking about ideprobe_init_module() not ide_init() :-).
> > You need to modprobe ide-detect if you are using generic IDE code
> > (no chipset specific driver - probably the case for your embedded
> > system).
>
> I know this, but ide-detect is basically an empty module, only calling
> ideprobe_init_module() can't this be done right away from ide.c or are
> there any reasons to delay the call until later at a user defined point of
> time?
YES. If you have some PCI IDE, you must load PCI chipset module before
loading ide-detect.o otherwise (you load ide-detect.o before your PCI chipset
module) generic IDE driver will own your IDE ports and you cannot use your
specific PCI chipset driver.
> > You are right that ide-probe-mini alias is not needed, ide-probe-mini.c
> > should be renamed to ide-detect.c (or ide-detect.o to ide-probe-mini.o).
> >
> > > --- linux-2.4.23.org/drivers/ide/ide.c 2003-11-28 19:26:20.000000000
> > > +0100 +++ linux-2.4.23/drivers/ide/ide.c 2004-03-11
> > > 20:31:51.000000000 +0100 @@ -514,11 +514,7 @@
> > >
> > > void ide_probe_module (int revaldiate)
> > > {
> > > - if (!ide_probe) {
> > > -#if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_MODULE)
> > > - (void) request_module("ide-probe-mod");
> > > -#endif
> > > - } else {
> > > + if (ide_probe) {
> > > (void) ide_probe->init();
> > > }
> > > revalidate_drives(revaldiate);
> >
> > You should make this change in ide_register_hw() instead:
> >
> > - ide_probe_module();
> > +#ifdef MODULE
> > + if (ideprobe_init_module() == -EBUSY)
> > +#endif
> > + ideprobe_init();
>
> Your patch will (if MODULE is defined) call ideprobe_init() twice,
> once from ideprobe_init_module() and once from ideprobe_init()
> should ideprobe_init really not only be called once and only once?
No, think about loading chipset modules. Some (i.e. ide-cs.o) are
calling ide_register_hw() and expect that this function will probe drives
(without need to load ide-detect.o by user). Change above preserves
current behavior (note that you may have more than one chipset module).
The same (probing for drives by chipset module) can be done for PCI
drivers but requires a some more work in case of 2.4.x kernels.
--bart
> > And get rid of ide_probe pointer.
> >
> > --bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-12 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-11 20:25 Daniel Tram Lux
2003-12-11 21:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-11 21:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-12 9:20 ` Daniel Tram Lux
2003-12-12 13:30 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2003-12-12 14:42 ` Daniel Tram Lux
2003-12-12 15:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-12 17:17 ` Daniel Tram Lux
2003-12-12 17:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-18 0:29 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-12-19 16:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-19 17:05 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-12-19 20:10 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-20 2:59 ` Andre Hedrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200312121430.36735.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--to=b.zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=daniel@starbattle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®