From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read()
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:25:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040128222521.75a7d74f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bv8qr7$m2v$1@news.cistron.nl>
"Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl> wrote:
>
> I have a Linux 2.6.2-rc2 NFS file server and another similar
> box as client. Kernel is compiled for SMP (hyperthreading).
>
> On the NFS server I'm exporting an XFS filesystem to the client
> over Gigabit ethernet. The client mounts using
> mount -o nfsvers=3,intr,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 server:/export/hwr /mnt
>
> On the client I then run a large dd to a file on the server,
> like dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/file bs=4096 count=800000
>
> In a few seconds, the server locks up. It spins in
> generic_fillattr(), apparently in the i_size_read() inline function.
> Server responds to pings and sysrq, but nothing else.
>
> 2.6.1 doesn't show this behaviour. I tested several kernels:
>
> 2.6.1 OK!
> 2.6.1-bk4 OK!
> 2.6.1-bk5 doesn't boot
> 2.6.1-bk6 hangs
> 2.6.2-rc1 hangs
> 2.6.2-rc2 hangs
> 2.6.2-rc2-gcc-2.95 hangs
> 2.6.2-rc1-mm3 OK!
> 2.6.2-rc2-mm1 OK!
>
> I can't reproduce it on the local filesystem on the NFS server
> directly, and I can't reproduce it on other filesystems than XFS.
> But NFSD+XFS locks up every time.
>
> Unfortunately the diff between 2.6.1-bk4 and bk6 is too large
> for me to see what the difference is, likewise 2.6.2-rc2-mm1,
> but perhaps someone has an idea what could be causing this ?
>
> Here's the sysrq output:
>
> Pid: 531, comm: nfsd
> EIP: 0060:[<c01577c2>] CPU: 0
> EIP is at generic_fillattr+0x82/0xa0
> EFLAGS: 00000246 Not tainted
> EAX: 00000000 EBX: 07ae7200 ECX: f650a0a0 EDX: 000113eb
> ESI: 00000000 EDI: f66cfed4 EBP: f66e5804 DS: 007b ES: 007b
> CR0: 8005003b CR2: 40019000 CR3: 37245000 CR4: 000006d0
> Call Trace:
> [<f8ab1f6b>] linvfs_getattr+0x2b/0x34 [xfs]
> [<c0157805>] vfs_getattr+0x25/0x84
> [<c01c19a3>] encode_post_op_attr+0x53/0x238
> [<c01c1e27>] encode_wcc_data+0x29f/0x2a8
> [<c01c4521>] nfs3svc_encode_commitres+0x19/0x5c
> [<c01b709d>] nfsd_dispatch+0x14d/0x1a3
> [<c02fb79b>] svc_process+0x3b3/0x640
> [<c01b6ddc>] nfsd+0x1e4/0x358
> [<c01b6bf8>] nfsd+0x0/0x358
> [<c0107251>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
>
Is the EIP _always_ inside generic_fillattr()?
If so then yes, your analysis look right. I'd say that the inode has been
corrupted and the seqcount counter has assumed an non-even value. That
will cause i_size_read() to lock up.
Are you using slab debugging? Is so, does the lockup go away if you change
mm/slab.c:POISON_FREE to an even value, say 0x6a? That would tend to
confirm a use-after-free problem. Or a totally wild pointer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-29 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-28 17:17 Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-29 6:25 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-01-29 23:20 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-04 0:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-03 14:13 ` Steve Lord
2004-02-04 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-04 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-04 0:06 ` David Weinehall
2004-02-04 0:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-30 16:01 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 20:21 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 22:13 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 22:34 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-30 22:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-30 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-31 1:25 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-31 1:38 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-31 11:46 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-31 15:59 ` Steve Lord
2004-02-01 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-31 16:41 ` Steve Lord
2004-01-31 17:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-01 1:46 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-30 23:07 ` Nathan Scott
2004-01-29 6:30 ` Nathan Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040128222521.75a7d74f.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome