mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read()
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:25:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040128222521.75a7d74f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bv8qr7$m2v$1@news.cistron.nl>

"Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl> wrote:
>
> I have a Linux 2.6.2-rc2 NFS file server and another similar
> box as client. Kernel is compiled for SMP (hyperthreading).
> 
> On the NFS server I'm exporting an XFS filesystem to the client
> over Gigabit ethernet. The client mounts using
> mount -o nfsvers=3,intr,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 server:/export/hwr /mnt
> 
> On the client I then run a large dd to a file on the server,
> like dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/file bs=4096 count=800000
> 
> In a few seconds, the server locks up. It spins in
> generic_fillattr(), apparently in the i_size_read() inline function.
> Server responds to pings and sysrq, but nothing else.
> 
> 2.6.1 doesn't show this behaviour. I tested several kernels:
> 
> 2.6.1           	OK!
> 2.6.1-bk4		OK!
> 2.6.1-bk5		doesn't boot
> 2.6.1-bk6		hangs
> 2.6.2-rc1		hangs
> 2.6.2-rc2		hangs
> 2.6.2-rc2-gcc-2.95	hangs
> 2.6.2-rc1-mm3		OK!
> 2.6.2-rc2-mm1		OK!
> 
> I can't reproduce it on the local filesystem on the NFS server
> directly, and I can't reproduce it on other filesystems than XFS.
> But NFSD+XFS locks up every time.
> 
> Unfortunately the diff between 2.6.1-bk4 and bk6 is too large
> for me to see what the difference is, likewise 2.6.2-rc2-mm1,
> but perhaps someone has an idea what could be causing this ?
> 
> Here's the sysrq output:
> 
> Pid: 531, comm:                 nfsd
> EIP: 0060:[<c01577c2>] CPU: 0
> EIP is at generic_fillattr+0x82/0xa0
>  EFLAGS: 00000246    Not tainted
> EAX: 00000000 EBX: 07ae7200 ECX: f650a0a0 EDX: 000113eb
> ESI: 00000000 EDI: f66cfed4 EBP: f66e5804 DS: 007b ES: 007b
> CR0: 8005003b CR2: 40019000 CR3: 37245000 CR4: 000006d0
> Call Trace:
>  [<f8ab1f6b>] linvfs_getattr+0x2b/0x34 [xfs]
>  [<c0157805>] vfs_getattr+0x25/0x84
>  [<c01c19a3>] encode_post_op_attr+0x53/0x238
>  [<c01c1e27>] encode_wcc_data+0x29f/0x2a8
>  [<c01c4521>] nfs3svc_encode_commitres+0x19/0x5c
>  [<c01b709d>] nfsd_dispatch+0x14d/0x1a3
>  [<c02fb79b>] svc_process+0x3b3/0x640
>  [<c01b6ddc>] nfsd+0x1e4/0x358
>  [<c01b6bf8>] nfsd+0x0/0x358
>  [<c0107251>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
> 

Is the EIP _always_ inside generic_fillattr()?

If so then yes, your analysis look right.  I'd say that the inode has been
corrupted and the seqcount counter has assumed an non-even value.  That
will cause i_size_read() to lock up.

Are you using slab debugging?  Is so, does the lockup go away if you change
mm/slab.c:POISON_FREE to an even value, say 0x6a?  That would tend to
confirm a use-after-free problem.  Or a totally wild pointer.





  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-29  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-28 17:17 Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-29  6:25 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-01-29 23:20   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-04  0:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-03 14:13       ` Steve Lord
2004-02-04 15:16         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-04 18:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-04  0:06       ` David Weinehall
2004-02-04  0:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-30 16:01   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 20:21   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 22:13     ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 22:34       ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-30 22:53         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-30 23:13           ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-31  1:25             ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-31  1:38               ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-31 11:46                 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-31 15:59                   ` Steve Lord
2004-02-01 16:15                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-31 16:41                       ` Steve Lord
2004-01-31 17:07               ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-01  1:46               ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-30 23:07         ` Nathan Scott
2004-01-29  6:30 ` Nathan Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040128222521.75a7d74f.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome