mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read()
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:16:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040204151647.A19158@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <401FAC70.8070104@xfs.org>; from lord@xfs.org on Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:13:04AM -0600

On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:13:04AM -0600, Steve Lord wrote:
> >  			ip->i_rdev = rdev;
> > -		else if (S_ISDIR(mode))
> > -			validate_fields(ip);
> > +		validate_fields(ip);
> 
> There was some reason this was only necessary on directories, but I
> cannot remember why just now.

Well, it is nessecary now to update i_size.  Or rather it was, I think
I can get rid of it again after taking care of initialize_vnode.

> I think this should work, it just leaves the extending O_DIRECT write
> case.

And initialize_vnode.  I have a working patch for the latter, but I still
need to take a look at O_DIRECT.

> Keeping the revalidate call out of the path for creating regular
> files would be nice though, why did you deem that necessary?

I thought I need it for i_size udates, but we should be able to take
care of it in initialize_vnode.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-04 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-28 17:17 Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-29  6:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-29 23:20   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-04  0:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-03 14:13       ` Steve Lord
2004-02-04 15:16         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-02-04 18:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-04  0:06       ` David Weinehall
2004-02-04  0:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-30 16:01   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 20:21   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 22:13     ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 22:34       ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-30 22:53         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-30 23:13           ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-31  1:25             ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-31  1:38               ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-31 11:46                 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-31 15:59                   ` Steve Lord
2004-02-01 16:15                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-31 16:41                       ` Steve Lord
2004-01-31 17:07               ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-01  1:46               ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-30 23:07         ` Nathan Scott
2004-01-29  6:30 ` Nathan Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040204151647.A19158@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=lord@xfs.org \
    --cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
    --cc=nathans@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®