From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read()
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:07:34 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040131100734.E3584036@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040130143459.5eed31f0.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:34:59PM -0800
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:34:59PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl> wrote:
> > What lock exactly is supposed to protect i_size_write, since it
> > appears that i_size_write is being called without proper locking ?
> > (Am I right?)
>
> If two CPUs hit i_size_write() at the same time we have a bug. That
> function requires that the caller provide external serialisation, via i_sem.
Hmm... I suspect we may not always be providing that in XFS -
I'll go audit our calls.
> Try adding this to the start of i_size_write():
>
> if (down_trylock(&inode->i_sem) == 0) {
> printk("I am buggy\n");
> dump_stack();
> up(&inode->i_sem);
> }
Let me know what you hit Miquel :) - I'll run the XFS tests
next week with this too and see what I can find.
thanks.
--
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-30 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-28 17:17 Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-29 6:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-29 23:20 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-04 0:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-03 14:13 ` Steve Lord
2004-02-04 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-04 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-04 0:06 ` David Weinehall
2004-02-04 0:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-30 16:01 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 20:21 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 22:13 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-30 22:34 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-30 22:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-30 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-31 1:25 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-31 1:38 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-31 11:46 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-31 15:59 ` Steve Lord
2004-02-01 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-31 16:41 ` Steve Lord
2004-01-31 17:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-01 1:46 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-30 23:07 ` Nathan Scott [this message]
2004-01-29 6:30 ` Nathan Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040131100734.E3584036@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®