mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Is LOADLIN still viable for 2.6?
@ 2004-02-23 15:05 Martin Bogomolni
  2004-02-23 16:11 ` Randy.Dunlap
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Bogomolni @ 2004-02-23 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel



When trying to load a 2.6 kernel from a FreeDOS environment, I am now very
consistently unable to load the kernel and an initial ramdisk via LOADLIN.  

The nature of the embedded system I'm working with, requires that DOS be
present prior to loading linux during an interactive startup and hardware
intialization phase.  

Since it doesn't seem that Hans Lermen has been updating or maintaining
loadlin since the release of 2.4 is there anyone who is continuing to maintain
LOADLIN, or has it fallen by the wayside?   Due to the nature of the system,
and a requirement for backwards compatibility and user interaction during
startup, I cannot use Peter Anvin's SYSLINUX linux loader which occurs too
early on in the process.

Are there any other options to startup a linux environment from DOS?





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-23 18:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-23 15:05 Is LOADLIN still viable for 2.6? Martin Bogomolni
2004-02-23 16:11 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-02-23 17:54   ` robert of northworthige
2004-02-23 17:59     ` Randy.Dunlap

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®